Dispelling Beauty Lies: The Truth About Feminine Beauty

Translate into the Occidental Translate into the Oriental

The facts about feminine beauty are simple and intuitive, even obvious. But public discussion of the topic is dominated by lies that confuse many women. Oddly enough, intelligent women seem to be the most susceptible. This makes it harder for them to attract mates, subjects them to misguided self-doubts, and even damages their health. Their efforts to improve their appearance are in vain because they aim at the wrong target. All too often they simply give up on a game they could win if they understood the rules. But for fear of being impolite, men never correct their illusions.

In this article I’ll dispel the confusion and tell you the straight truth about feminine attractiveness. In the closing section I’ll offer some practical advice. (Note: if you can't read the font, click the "translate" button above.)

A warning before you continue: I won't pander to boost your self-esteem. Writing the truth instead of repeating familiar lies will offend some readers. Most women will experience discomfort. If you're emotionally fragile or psychologically troubled, you should stop here. However, learning the truth will enable clear-sighted women to improve their appearance and succeed at the game of beauty. This is a prize that's worth the cost.

Dispelling Beauty Lies is the most accurate and comprehensive guide to feminine beauty ever written. If you’re ready for real answers, read on.

I. Everyone lies
II. Learning from love goddesses
III. Imaginary women
IV. The truth about breast size
V. Common and uncommon tastes
VI. Market forces
VII. The most important secret about faces
VIII. A note on masculine beauty
IX. "Beauty" and "hotness"
X. Correcting homework
XI. Drawing the right conclusions
XII. Reality-based beauty tips
XIII. Answering objections
Appendix: survey results
Afterword

I. Everyone lies

Why are lies about beauty abundant?

Beauty is so socially important that almost everyone has a reason to lie about it.

The fashion industry uses tall, ultra-thin models to impress and intimidate customers. The tactic increases clothing sales, but these models aren’t the best examples of beauty. Similarly, paid beauty writers and influencers make their money from advertising fashion and beauty products. The conflict of interest discourages them from giving accurate advice.

Body-positive influencers sometimes praise the beauty of unhealthy figures in a way that seems disconnected from reality. They expand their audience through flattery and pandering, not honesty. Journalists lie about beauty to bolster their favorite social and political causes, which they consider far more important than the truth.

Market forces compel even well-meaning people in the beauty industry to endorse conventional lies instead of providing all the help they could. As one cosmetic surgeon informed me with regret, “You can't tell women the truth because they'll crucify you. You'll go out of business.”

Men have incentives to lie about what attracts them as well. To be polite, or to flatter. Or even to show their good taste. Pretending not to notice overt sex appeal is a way of signaling refinement and class. It implies that they’re subtler and more perceptive than other men. But it also projects a false picture of what they really want.

Some insecure women deride any concept of beauty that doesn't match what they see in the mirror. Unable to acknowledge their own imperfections, they hope words alone can make them the fairest of all. Others intentionally promote beauty lies with fabrications, malicious gossip, and petty insults directed at their more attractive competitors.

Even the most beautiful and self-assured women will lie, whether to guard their secrets, to sabotage their competitors, or because they don’t really know the answers themselves.

Self-deception compounds the problem. Once you're invested in the lies you've been told by marketers, flatterers, and competitors, it's psychologically difficult to accept the truth. You're tempted to behead the messenger and cling to feeble counterarguments you wouldn't take seriously in any other context. And your friends tell you what you want to hear, because their only alternative is to hurt and offend someone they love.

“What makes a woman attractive?” is a milgram question. In other words, the social penalty for an unflattering answer is much higher than the reward for telling the truth. Because of this we simply can’t trust the answers we receive, even if they’re coming from friends.

In sum, everyone’s lying about beauty. And when you consider the motivations I’ve just listed, it shouldn’t be a surprise. We have very good reasons to lie!

All these lies can carry over into science. Scientific studies of beauty are often based on questionnaires. The scientists just perform a statistical analysis and repackage the results as verified truth. But survey responses on sexual topics are unreliable. Fancy mathematical language might make these studies sound authoritative, but it can't transform a collection of false answers into a true one. And there's a limit to how well a handful of numbers can characterize beauty.

So to reveal the truth I won’t rely on surveys or professed opinions. Instead I’ll present direct evidence of men’s real preferences.

Why should men be the ones to judge what's beautiful? My approach here is simple and practical, not philosophical. The main purpose of personal beauty is to attract and satisfy a member of the opposite sex. There are other reasons to be beautiful, but they make a much smaller contribution to human happiness. That means men are the most important judges of feminine beauty, just as women are the most important judges of masculine beauty.

Your professors may have taught you to loathe the "male gaze." This crazy attitude will do you more harm than good. In fact, it's far worse than a beauty lie. You can't win by condemning the judges. Instead you should embrace your potential for beauty, and use it to cultivate a fulfilling romantic and sexual relationship.

Some claim an uncompromising analysis of feminine beauty is inherently misogynistic. This is quite opposite to the truth. Empowerment is about being able to get what you want. The more beauty you have, the easier it is to get what you want. And the better you understand beauty, the easier it is to obtain it. It's that simple.

Those who justify dishonesty by labelling the truth misogynistic are taking advantage of you. They're disempowering you and implying women are too fragile to handle reality. This article, in contrast, aims to help any woman who's ready to open her eyes. In the final account, its accuracy will be borne out by its efficacy.

II. Learning from love goddesses

Let’s begin with the most enduring visual examples of feminine beauty: love goddesses. The representations below were created hundreds or even thousands of years apart by groups that spoke different languages and lived in different climates. Despite differences in their style, function, and degree of realism, they share common features.

The love goddesses typically have an hourglass figure, with a small waist, larger than average breasts, and pronounced hips. They have a moderate, healthy weight: fairly slim, but not skinny.

This Indian statue is two thousand years old.

These two Minoan examples are more than three thousand years old.

This Babylonian love goddess is nearly four thousand years old.

Below are erotic odalisque paintings from 19th-century America, France, and Italy.

A mountain of historical evidence shows no correlation between high status and a taste for thin, curveless women. This is a sculpture of a famous upper-class courtesan from 19th-century Paris.

Nor were obese women widely preferred. Rubens is often cited as a counterexample to conventional beauty standards. But his corpulent figures, such as the last image below, are exceptions in a long history of love-goddess representations that fit the general trend. Outliers like this don't nullify the rule.

Obese prehistoric figurines like the 30,000-year-old “Venus of Willendorf” are also frequently raised as counterexamples. But they don't qualify as love goddesses. The “Venus” appellation is arbitrary and disputed by scholars. These figurines weren't found with a label, and their true meaning and function are unknown.

And there is, in fact, no shortage of ancient figurines which do exhibit the hourglass shape common in verifiable love-goddess representations.

In the next gallery you’ll find a selection of famous cartoons of attractive women that spans several decades: Sleeping Beauty, Jasmine, Jessica Rabbit, and three popular Japanese anime characters.

These images are in some cases exaggerated, but that’s the nature of cartoon art. On the other hand, social conventions set limits on the figures "serious" artists could depict. For instance, critics condemned William Etty's Venus and her Satellites (below) as pornographic in the 1830s.

Most paintings and sculptures are sexually understated, partly because they’re made for public display in places where it would be inappropriate to inspire lust, and partly because unrestrained sex appeal would dominate men's attention and distract them from subtler elements of the artwork.

Despite these limitations, the cartoons, paintings, and sculptures of love goddesses share the same salient characteristics.

Cultural and regional variations do exist, but are smaller than you might assume. For instance, the ideal women preferred by American and Japanese men are more similar than real American and Japanese women!

Finally, here are three of the goddesses juxtaposed with human models.

So love goddesses and archetypes of beauty follow a pattern. However, they're not all identical. For instance, classical Greek statues don't have the small waist and wide hips evident in our other examples. Nor do the later Venuses copied from them.

While the persistence of this particular deviation was partly driven by a founder effect, its original motive is open to debate. Even in ancient times many influential artists were homosexual, perhaps including Botticelli himself.

When we look earlier into Greek history, we can find the familiar figure seen in love-goddess representations around the world.

Nevertheless, exceptions are real and can't all be dismissed so easily.

Historical artwork may be compelling, but it's not enough to make a strong case. Furthermore, we can't rule out the possibility that current tastes differ from traditional ones. To reliably determine what men find attractive today, we'll have to examine more evidence.

III. Imaginary women

If men won’t tell the truth when asked what they find attractive, how can we ever know? One way is to look at what they choose in secret when they're free to have exactly what they want.

Humans are imperfect by nature. So in real life men rarely have the option to pick exactly what they want, and compromise is the norm. To avoid hurting feelings they publicly pretend their compromise was their ideal all along. Imaginary substitutes, however, allow men to bypass the limitations of reality and get something that actually does look just like their ideal.

The best guides to men's real beauty preferences, therefore, are imaginary women selected in private. These fall into three main categories: sex dolls, erotic drawings, and computer-generated women like those above. In this section I'll analyze each in turn.

Women are typically loath to give credence to any of these privately imagined ideals. Not only are they incurious, they actively turn away from them to avoid knowing. This is an unfortunate mistake.

Putting your head in the sand may soothe your ego in the short term, but in the long term ignorance will do you harm. So please set aside your squeamishness and skepticism for a moment. There will be plenty of time later to debate the value of the evidence.

I’ve researched sex doll inventories at four online stores. Below I'll tell you what I found, starting with a little math you can skim over if you wish.

In mathematical terms, the most popular sex dolls at the four retailers had a waist-to-bust ratio of 0.61, and a waist-to-hip ratio of 0.61 too. In normal bust-waist-hips clothing measurements, that’s equivalent to 39-24-39. To check this number I averaged the measurements of over two hundred sex dolls from the inventory of one retailer. The resulting proportions were 0.65 and 0.61 respectively, equivalent to 37-24-39. By contrast, the average Victoria’s Secret lingerie model has a waist-to-bust ratio of 0.75, a waist-to-hip ratio of 0.71, and clothing measurements of 32-24-34.

The exact numbers aren't especially important here. In plain language, the majority of men choose dolls with far more pronounced curves than lingerie models.

As you can see, the typical sex doll resembles the example images in the previous section, while the runway model is distinctly different: not only thinner, but also narrower at both the hips and chest. The runway model's greater height also causes her body to seem more elongated.

The differences are evident from the rear as well. In addition to wider hips, the typical sex doll has far thicker buttocks and thighs than a runway model, with no thigh gap. The overall appearance is rounded instead of flat.

Sex dolls might be inherently tawdry, but the example below shows their basic shape is both beautiful and respectable in a woman with the right clothing and presentation, even when judged by very conservative standards. In fact, sex dolls are much closer to the classic female figure of traditional painting than fashion models are.

You can see the same shape in these photos of vintage actress Sophia Loren, who measures 38-24-38. Her figure is classic, beautiful, and elegant, not trashy or cheap. She looks good in many different styles, including formal and business attire.

How can we confirm our observations? Let's consider erotic drawings. This is another case where men can choose exactly what they want, privately and without compromises.

The figures in modern erotic drawings again share basic similarities with those found in traditional paintings, but they're less limited by social restrictions on sexual expression.

The imaginary proportions of fictional women in manga and anime intended to appeal to men are strikingly similar to those of sex dolls. Fourteen female characters selected from the most popular erotic animes have a purported median waist-to-bust ratio of 0.62 and a median waist-to-hip ratio of 0.64, equivalent to clothing measurements of 39-24-37. Of course, the drawings themselves can be far more outlandish than these imaginary numbers. You can see some example figures below.

The rear view of popular erotic anime girls also confirms our observations. Just like sex dolls, their legs have a rounded shape and no thigh gap. They're thicker than many women expect.

Height is widely thought to have little effect on feminine beauty. The average sex doll is exactly as tall as the average woman worldwide, and the range of variation is close to that seen in the female population. This supports the conventional view.

Nevertheless, height still causes confusion. Fashion models aren't just tall in absolute terms. They also have a low width-to-height ratio that makes them look reedy.

Fashion marketing encourages women to believe these elongated proportions are the most beautiful. But that's not the case.

A visual examination of AI girls makes this clear. In the examples above and below, I've elongated or shortened a typical AI girl's body to imitate the difference between an average woman and a runway model.

Some women assume the images at right are the most attractive. But the center images are the ones actually created by AI artists.

Erotic drawings show considerable variation, but usually look closer to the center figures above than the left or right ones.

Sex dolls, on the other hand, often do look elongated. Here material costs have intervened. Sex dolls are expensive, and thicker dolls cost more. So poor men buy dolls with a low width-to-height ratio, short torso, and thin legs to save money without compromising other traits they care about more. You can see the result below. At left is an AI girl, and at right is a sex doll with cheap legs.

This difference between sex dolls and other imaginary women is informative regardless of whether financial limitations are fully responsible. While men may prefer a particular width-to-height ratio, it's of secondary importance, and considerable deviation from the mean is tolerable. So elongated women aren't more beautiful than average women, but they're not ugly either.

Even apart from height in general, long legs in particular are sometimes cited in movies as exemplifying sex appeal. But once again, this has no basis in reality. Men care about the sizes and shapes of butts and thighs, not leg length. That's why AI girls are normally cropped above the knees. You can verify this by scanning through the images provided.

Imaginary women tend to have plump thighs. If you compare arms and thighs you'll see this isn't just a matter of being heavy. Most men prefer thin arms, with fat deposits located specifically in the thighs. Women struggle to understand the appeal of thick thighs, perhaps because they'd be ugly on men. But if men liked the same things you do, they'd be gay. Whether it makes sense to you or not, thick thighs are an attractive trait.

Imaginary women have wide hips too. Sex dolls' hips are normally only wide in comparison to their waists. But erotic drawings and AI girls often have hips that are wide in absolute terms as well. Consider the images above and below.

If your waist isn't as small as a sex doll's, wide hips are necessary to create a good hourglass figure. And if you do have a tiny waist, they're still advantageous. Narrow hips, on the other hand, are unattractive in women.

Sex dolls don't really have an age, but it's worth asking what age they appear to be. I circulated a dozen photos of randomly selected dolls on social media and asked readers to guess. The median estimate was twenty-two. So peak attractiveness appears to occur in the early twenties. You can see these dolls in the gallery below and make your own estimate.

A major retailer categorizes 25% of their dolls as “teen,” 12% as “milf,” and 63% as standard. If most men really preferred teenagers, as some claim, we'd expect most sex dolls to be listed in the teen category. But that isn't the case. In fact, teens are only twice as popular as "milfs."

Even so, some signs of age are unequivocally bad. While a few sex dolls do have gray hair, none have obvious wrinkles. This suggests the variance in men's taste for youthfulness is rather limited. You can see a “milf” doll below.

Anime girls have very young faces and very adult bodies, and they're drawn in an unrealistic style. By consequence it's impossible to determine their age.

The confusing combination of a juvenile face and a sexually mature body isn't an accident, however. It's common in AI-generated erotic imagery as well. When they were shown the following AI-generated image in two pieces, men estimated her face to be around sixteen and her body to be around twenty-four.

Similarly, the thirtysomething model below accrued millions of followers by using a "teen" AI filter to make her face look much younger than her body. Oddly enough, men rarely notice the incongruity before it's pointed out. To see the images they're paying for, click here. The real, unfiltered model is circled in red at the bottom of the page. (N.B. Most links, including this one, are to unclothed images.)

So men typically prefer the combination of a neotenous face and a mature body. Imaginary women may take this to extremes never found in reality.

However, some of the most attractive real women exhibit the same traits. "Early twenties" isn't a magic number that men fetishize. It just happens to be the age where this combination is most likely to occur.

You might find the generous curves showcased here overwhelming, and wish men were indifferent to the size of your hips, butt, and breasts. Well, be careful what you wish for. While few in number, curveless AI girls do exist. They still have childlike faces, but they almost never possess the tall, lanky adult figure of runway models. Instead they just look juvenile. And indeed, underage.

How common is the taste for immature women? 3% of the sexualized images posted under the #aigirl hashtag have neither adult faces nor adult bodies. I evaluated 350 images and included only indisputable cases, so this errs on the side of understatement. Many look as young as eight or nine years old. In a large database of erotic drawings, 2% of images tagged “one girl” are also tagged “loli” (n=5,700,000). This too is likely an underestimate of real preferences, because loli images require a paid subscription that other images don't. Finally, in a popular online fetish survey, 3.9% of men expressed interest in pre-pubescent children.

None of this data is completely reliable, and given the sensitivity of the topic there's no way to establish exact numbers. But with multiple lines of evidence in agreement, it's reasonable to estimate the fraction of men who prefer pre-pubescent girls at around three percent.

So there are indeed men who don't like curves. And imaginary women, by evading the legal restrictions on photos, reveal a simple rule about them. Men who don't like curves like kids. This rule isn't absolute, but exceptions are remarkably rare.

To some extent the rule applies in degrees as well. Because curves aren't fully developed until adulthood, men with a stronger preference for youth tend to be less interested in curves, while men who prefer larger curves tend to be less concerned about age. Tension between these preferences explains some of the variation in men's tastes.

This same tension allows us to explain some of the apparent inconsistencies in the historical examples we reviewed in the previous section. Many historical cultures favored earlier marriages than are now considered permissible. So they necessarily imputed greater sexual value to immature figures, and sometimes represented them in their art. At present, however, the fraction of men who desire children's bodies is quite low, and the taste for a well-developed adult body is the norm.

Concluding qualifications are in order. The fact that men today perceive peak attractiveness to occur in the early twenties on average doesn't imply that everyone peaks at the same age. Nor does it imply that a younger woman is always more beautiful than her seniors, nor least of all that beauty "hits a wall" at age thirty. Peak and slope are not the same thing.

As I'll explain later, there's still hope for older women. So please be patient and keep reading whatever your age.

Some people object to the idea of using sex dolls, erotic drawings, and AI girls to reveal men's preferences. They claim imaginary women in general, and sex dolls in particular, are the refuge of low-value men, and because of this they're not a reliable indicator of broader male tastes. However, you may have noticed that ice cream tastes good to the young and old, the rich and the poor alike. So it is with many types of beauty.

What distinguishes sexually successful men from unsuccessful ones isn't their basic sense of the female form, but rather their ability to obtain it. A broad network of evidence, including love goddesses and erotic oil paintings commissioned by wealthy aristocrats, tells the same story about feminine beauty. And we'll expand this evidence further as we continue. Dismissing all of it is simply wishful thinking, usually motivated by insecurity.

The footage above shows upper-class women walking at a park in 1902. Traditional aristocratic clothing was designed to create a pronounced hourglass surpassing even today's most generously proportioned sex dolls. Those who deride the taste for curves evident in imaginary women as low-class or porn-induced are historically ignorant. If they wish to engage in snobbery, they shouldn't do it by advertising the plebian quality of their education.

It's important to understand that imaginary women actually give us a more accurate picture of male preferences than real glamour models. That’s because if men prefer multiple uncorrelated traits on the tail of the distribution in the female population, even the best real models will necessarily be a compromise with the mean. The same argument applies a fortiori to pornographic actresses, who are drawn from the very small population of willing participants, and thus unlikely to represent the ideal. This is a consequence of statistical laws, not male desire, and it leads us to underestimate the demand for rare traits.

So real glamour models can indicate the direction of male preferences, but not their extent. Imaginary women aren’t subject to the same limitation. This makes them especially useful for answering our next question.

IV. The truth about breast size

Women frequently ask: what breast size do men really prefer? Of all the questions about attractiveness, this is the one where men are most likely to lie when asked directly. In fact, they lie so often that some women begin to doubt the obvious answer.

A professor thoroughly reviewed the scientific research on size preferences for a major periodical. He concluded that men prefer average breasts, and women are fooling themselves into believing size matters.

Some girls might be inclined to believe intellectual authorities like this professor instead of stereotypes and common sense. But they shouldn't. He's wrong.

Once again we can learn the truth if we look at what men actually choose in private. A large online sex-doll retailer categorizes their dolls by breast size. The frequency of these sizes is as follows:

Note that the terminology they use is misleading, since "small" refers to the average size of a slim woman, and "medium" is already large by everyday standards. That means around 80% of men choose what we normally call big breasts. And they do so even though buxom dolls are more expensive. Here are examples of each size according to the retailer's classification.

A second retailer categorizes dolls by cup size. The distribution of their inventory is visualized in the next graph. The result is essentially the same, but we can add a few additional details to our observations:

• Only 2% of men want an A-cup.
• 90% of men want more than a B-cup.
• 78% of men want "large" breasts (D-cup or more).
• The average man wants an E- or F-cup.
• 43% of men want a G-cup or more.

Below you'll find similar data drawn from an anime image site, once again followed by examples of each size. Men's order of preference is exactly the same as above. However, among this audience "large" breasts have an even bigger advantage over the other sizes.

Cartoons are prone to exaggeration, so we can't assume these translate directly to reality. Nor should we assume they don't. Fortunately exactness isn't necessary for our purposes here. From the evidence above we can draw three reliable conclusions that will hold even if our data is imprecise.

First, male preferences for breast size vary a great deal. Not all men prefer big breasts. Some prefer small, others enormous.

Second, the demand for larger sizes is much greater than the supply. The average male already prefers a size rarely found in nature, and the gap between supply and demand increases with size, without any practical limit.

This means that “bigger is better” is true in an economic sense even if it isn’t true in an absolute sense. In simple terms, the most buxom women are highly valued because there aren’t enough of them to go around, not because all men prefer them.

Third, the median preference is broadly similar to the size we’ve seen in earlier examples, and conforms to well-known stereotypes. It’s also close to the size of common glamour models like “page 3” girls or centerfolds. In fact, some vintage centerfolds (NSFW) are larger than most sex dolls, despite the extreme rarity of this size in the general population. So are these storefront mannequins designed to attract passersby.

When we consider both overall clothing measurements and bust size, here’s what the median sex doll looks like.

You might still be tempted to dismiss these conclusions because they're derived from an analysis of imaginary women. So I’ll now draw your attention to the top 50 uncensored image-search results for “best breasts” (NSFW). This search was conducted anonymously using Tor to avoid contaminating the results with any past history.

Large breasts are the most common result by a wide margin, and only a single image shows an A-cup. The first model resembles the median sex doll above. An uncensored search for older images yields a very similar outcome.

Of course, search results can fluctuate depending on the precise terms used, the search engine, and the degree of censorship. In Bing, censorship and term variation increases the average bust size from large to huge. Google skews results toward celebrity gossip unless you use an explicit term. Yahoo falls somewhere in between. But no matter how you search, big always comes out ahead.

While you shouldn't put much faith in search results on their own, they do add more evidence to an already voluminous pile. And it turns out that sex dolls actually give us a moderate and conservative representation of male taste. This article may draw on imaginary women, but the conclusions are quite real.

Skeptics are thus faced with an impossible question: if guys don't like large breasts, why do they keep seeking them out when you're not looking?

Some just can't accept the fact that a substantial majority of men prefer well-endowed women. Feeling their self-esteem is at stake, they resort to flimsy fallback positions. The most popular of these is “But rich men prefer small breasts.” This is no more plausible than the claim that rich women prefer poorly endowed men. If women with wealthy husbands really believed it, they'd hire maids with double-Ds to protect their marriages. But they don't.

It's easy to explain the supposed class difference in breast size preference. Status conscious men feign indifference to the obvious in order to signal their refinement. Then flat-chested women who fear they can't compete on the basis of sex appeal amplify the claim to stigmatize a trait they don't possess and slander their competitors as peasants.

They're lying for their own gain. And they're guilty of hypocrisy too, because women's analogous attraction to size is just as strong as men's.

Common sense, stereotypes, search results, AI images, sex dolls, anime girls, and vintage centerfolds all agree. It doesn't matter if men deny it to be polite or to impress you with their refinement. The evidence they're attracted to large breasts is overwhelming. In practice, bigger is better.

So what do "perfect" breasts actually look like? I asked men to submit photos of large breasts with a perfect shape and then vote on their favorites. You can see the most popular images here (NSFW). Men's top choices look remarkably similar.

It isn't surprising that men are fascinated by large breasts. But the public response to the data I've just presented reveals that many women are too. They react much more strongly to remarks on breast size than any other beauty topic, including weight and age. This implies they subconsciously believe, or at least fear, that large breasts are the centerpiece of feminine sex appeal. Self-esteem makes it hard for them to acknowledge this belief even to themselves. The most impassioned denials come from the most breast obsessed. After all, if they didn't think breast size was extremely important, they wouldn't be so upset.

The almost universal refusal to publicly acknowledge just how big a contribution big breasts make to feminine beauty is one of the most bizarre social phenomena of our time. Future generations will surely wonder what the fuss was about, and whether this section really had to be so thorough. Unfortunately, it did.

If you're poorly endowed, don't despair. There are many elements of beauty, and breast size is only one of them. Really. So please resist the temptation to obsess. Later in this article I'll offer some words of encouragement, and also discuss whether cosmetic surgery might be a viable option.

V. Common and uncommon tastes

The diverse examples we’ve examined so far point toward a common male taste. This common taste is remarkably consistent between times and places.

To summarize, most men are attracted to women with a small waist, large breasts, a rounded rear, and prominent hips. They prefer women who have pronounced curves but aren’t overweight or obese. There is no evidence they favor the extreme thinness and tall, elongated figure of fashion models. In fact, the shape preferred by men is strikingly different from the shape of fashion models.

The average woman is also strikingly different from fashion models, and resembles a sex doll more than a runway model, as the following table of measurements shows.

The average woman from 1951 is four or five inches wider than runway models in every measurement. Yet her bust and hips are almost the same as those of sex dolls or anime girls. Waist size and cup size are the most significant factors that set an attractive figure apart from an average one.

Women assume they can see through fashion marketing and other beauty lies, and will claim to know that men like curves. But they're often confused about what "men like curves" really means. They may envision lingerie models in push-up bras, or actresses whose curves fall well short of the proportions men prefer. These media representations of sex appeal aren't accurate.

Note that the drawings above don't simply have larger breasts than the models and actresses, but also wider hips, thicker legs, and higher bodyfat. You can see the same pattern in the images below, which compare typical models for a famous "sexy" lingerie brand to similarly dressed women whom most men would find more appealing.

And the pattern isn't limited to the most popular images. The next chart shows the relative frequency of over four million tags in a huge database of erotic drawings. Curves are overwhelmingly important, while "thinness" barely even registers.

The gap between women's intuitions about what's attractive and men's actual preferences is most pronounced at the extremes. The unusually curvaceous woman below was rated "hot" by 91% of men, but only 60% of women.

To guess what men want, you should use reason, not just intuition. Women consistently underestimate the appeal of feminine curves, so when in doubt, assume that more is more.

One major sex-doll retailer sells over a hundred detachable heads, and only a single headless body. This limitation gives them a strong incentive to offer a body with proportions that will please the largest possible number of men and offend the fewest, and gives us a perfect opportunity to visualize the common male taste. You can see it here (NSFW). Now you have an accurate picture.

(Long after the previous paragraph was written, the retailer added two more torsos made by a different brand, shown in the gallery above. As you can see, the range of variation is quite limited.)

The voluptuous hourglass figure preferred by so many men is a well-known stereotype, but oddly excluded from magazines and media that address the topic of fashion and beauty for women. The narrow and skinny ideal that replaces it is both less attainable and less attractive.

Some women feel compelled to make excuses for the errors of the beauty industry. It's Stockholm syndrome. They claim a boyish figure is what women really want, and that rail-thin models are necessary to put clothes on display effectively. These defenses are absurd.

It's a verifiable fact that most influential fashion designers aren't attracted to women. It would be unreasonable to assume this has no impact on their tastes, and also unreasonable to assume their tastes have no influence on their work.

The claim that designers choose models who resemble boys because "they're like walking coat hangers and better for showing off women's clothing" is already implausible at first blush. There's simply no reason women's clothes would look better on hangers than on women's bodies unless they're not properly designed for women's bodies. And there's no non-laughable excuse for standardizing female models' measurements to match those of male teenagers.

The deeper you look, the more farfetched the stock defenses sound. Indeed, they're exactly the kind of lies you'd tell if you wanted to remove the female form from the runway. When you trust male gays over the male gaze, you should expect to be misled in particular ways. It's not that they want to turn women into men in order to sleep with them, but that their instincts draw them away from truly feminine proportions rather than toward them.

The images below reveal a double standard. While male models have pronounced masculine sexual traits, female models have diminished feminine sexual traits. In other words, designers promote men who look like men, and women who look like (or are) boys. What's most astonishing is that they've convinced the public to swallow this.

The problem isn't limited to the choice of models. Below you can see nine styles from different designers presented at Paris Fashion Week. In each case the clothing itself imposes a masculine V shape (broad shoulders, narrow hips) on the model's body. It erases the female form and overwrites it with a male one. Properly designed clothes would do the opposite, bringing out the hourglass shape to enhance femininity.

The fashion world's de facto campaign against the female form has been so effective that today most women think the model on the right below is a weird and abnormal example of feminine beauty, whereas the model on the left is a good and admirable one. They've quite literally been trained to believe that men make more beautiful women than women. When they double down and denounce those who prefer the female model as “misogynistic,” one doesn't know whether to laugh or cry.

Some will admit runway models are prone to excess, yet believe they can find the correct answer by averaging these two figures. That's lazy thinking. Averaging a wrong answer and a right one just gives you another wrong answer.

In sharp contrast to fashion designers' vision of beauty, consider the vintage romance covers below. These novels were written by women and cater to women's fantasies. Many of the covers were painted by women as well. The protagonists resemble sex dolls and AI girls more than fashion models or actresses. And this doesn't prevent their dresses from being very appealing to men and women alike.

The fashion world has created a negative-sum game with arbitrary rules. They grant women status points for achieving a boyish look that's both taxing to maintain and unattractive to the majority of the population. But when free to dream their own private dreams, it seems women would rather have a curvaceous, feminine figure that satisfies the common male taste. They want to be loved and lusted after, not just held up as trophies for public display.

There's no denying that the particular type of ugliness promoted by the fashion industry can increase a woman's status in some subcultures today. And if society were less interconnected, it would be amusing to let so-called "elites" continue mimicking gay beauty ideals to impress each other for another hundred years. But this same influence is pushing all women to make poorer choices, look worse, and enjoy life less than they could. A negative-sum signaling regime impoverishes everyone it touches.

Because today's fashionable ideals are doing real harm to public welfare, they need to be harshly criticized until their influence is ended. Realigning socially approved aesthetic goals with genuine beauty, as revealed in men's true, private preferences, will have enormous benefits whose full extent will only be appreciated in retrospect.

The impression that you need to reduce your body's sex appeal to find a quality mate is an illusion generated by beauty lies. It's just not the case. Later on I'll explain how good clothing choices, speech, and behavior will allow you to display class and character without sacrificing your beauty to the twisted norms of the fashion world.

Of course, not all men are looking for an hourglass. Uncommon tastes are quite real. Everyone knows there are some who prefer the petite, girlish look, or the tomboy look, or the extravagantly well-endowed look, even though these tastes aren’t pervasive enough to be reflected in the statues of love goddesses. And a few men really do prefer runway models or Rubenesque figures.

Below you can see a random selection of AI-generated images posted on social media under the "#AIgirl" hashtag. While most of them match the common male taste, the remainder cater instead to the minority tastes I've just mentioned.

Unfortunately, some writers become too enamored of relativism. They use these real minority tastes to justify the pretense that the norm doesn’t exist and doesn’t matter. Then they go on to claim that everything is beautiful. This lazy attitude is intended to flatter your self-esteem, not help you succeed. You shouldn’t trust it.

VI. Market forces

Beauty might be relative. Does that mean anything goes? Practically speaking, no. Consider supply and demand.

To catch and please a mate, it’s advantageous to have traits whose demand exceeds the supply. It’s disadvantageous to have traits whose supply exceeds the demand. (Where taste is concerned, the reverse is true. That is, you'll have an easier time getting what you want if there's an oversupply of potential mates who match your taste.)

For example, there are more men who prefer a small waist than there are women who have one. So women with a small waist have a relatively easy time finding a mate. In contrast, only a few men prefer obese women. There are far more obese women than there are men who prefer them, so they have a hard time finding a mate. And even if they succeed, they may be treated carelessly, because they're easily replaced. Don't behead the messenger. This is the cruelty of Mother Nature.

The logic of supply and demand seems too cold and disturbing for some women to accept. But consider the alternatives. If we pretend beauty is objective and universal, we can't explain the variation in tastes. And if we pretend everyone is equally beautiful, we can't explain why some looks are valued more than others. Only an economic analysis respects differences and still accurately captures what we all observe. It's by far the most broad-minded way to make sense of human beauty.

While polls aren’t particularly reliable, the poll below gives a reasonable estimate of overall demand. The added black lines indicate approximate supply. The most advantageous traits are the ones with the biggest gap between these two.

According to the poll, the most advantageous set of traits is: hourglass figure, thin, oversized breasts, bubble butt. Once again, this matches the beauty examples we’ve given above. But the variety evident in the poll also shows that there’s more than one way to be attractive. It’s not necessary to conform to the majority taste to succeed.

The data we gathered earlier allowed us to establish a simple mathematical formula for the woman preferred by the median male: 37-24-39, F-cup, 22 years old. But supply and demand shifts the advantage away from this median toward rarer extremes, like the example below.

In fact, the appearance desired by the largest number of men isn't always the best. It's counterintuitive, but some women can have more success with rare looks the majority of men dislike! In these cases it's actually good to be weird.

Skeptical? The following illustration shows one way this can happen. If you can't follow this graph, don't worry. Just remember that you don't need to please everyone to be beautiful.

Nevertheless, rarity isn't sufficient to make everything valuable. When demand is too low, uncommon traits are still a real disadvantage. For instance, tattoos are a dubious choice even in subcultures where they've been normalized.

Butt size is an element of beauty where supply and demand is especially relevant. That's why I'm going to discuss it at greater length here rather than in a separate section.

Men broadly agree about the best butt shape, but disagree about the best size. This is the case for leg volume in general as well. Data from sex dolls and anime girls suggests that around a third of men prefer large butts over medium. That's less than a majority. But because there are more men who desire them than women who have them, bigger is better anyway.

Traits that are this divisive are usually rather unimportant. But many of the men who prefer large butts consider them the single most erotic trait. This is confirmed by the clear popularity of models whose main selling point is a large rear. Here's one example with both a particularly good shape and a substantial following.

So women who have a large rear should play it up, and those who can develop one should do so. This will turn some men off even as it turns others on. But as I've already pointed out, it's better to be highly attractive to some men than only moderately attractive to all men.

I asked men to send me unclothed reference photos of the best large butt shape and then vote on their submissions. Here you can see the most popular photos. And here are larger submissions which are less popular, but rarer and therefore highly valued. Take note of the extra rear projection evident in some of these images, and especially the left photo below. This is an attractive characteristic distinct from size.

Supply and demand aren't the only factors that shift the most desirable appearance away from the median. Surprisingly, indifference does as well.

Suppose you're planning dinner with a friend. You don't care what you eat, but your friend insists on seafood. Naturally, you won't bother to argue. Seafood wins, because your friend cares and you don't. A similar effect applies to feminine beauty.

Whenever some men care about a trait others are indifferent to, the most valuable trait isn't the one that matches the median taste. It's the one that satisfies those who care. This applies in degrees as well, and impacts many salient traits, including age, nose shape, butt and breast size, hair length, hair color, and even eyebrows.

Although the consequences vary, the indifference effect tends to benefit women who satisfy tastes for uncommon traits. Indifferent men create the illusion of an optimum closer to the average woman, because they're likely to choose common traits by default rather than genuine preference.

Before we move on, let's pause to summarize this section in a few sentences. Median male tastes aren't a perfect guide to attractiveness. Women with rare traits that satisfy minority tastes are valued even if they're unpopular. And often they're more popular than women who match median tastes exactly. Because people neglect to consider market forces, they mistakenly believe the most advantageous appearance falls closer to the average than it really does.

I'll address a short post-script regarding market forces to any men who might be reading.

Men typically try to improve the quality of the mates they can catch by raising the “price” they can afford to pay. That is, by improving themselves, their social position, or their skill at seduction. This is rational on an individual level. But it's actually a zero-sum game for men as a group.

Collectively, men can only catch better mates by improving the supply. In other words, by helping women to be the best they can be. Please keep this in mind before you engage in the battle of the sexes. The best world is a world where everyone wins.

VII. The most important secret about faces

Beauty lies aren't a serious problem when it comes to faces, so I'm not going to include a detailed analysis of facial beauty in this article. Instead I'll tell you the most important secret about faces.

It's no secret that men broadly agree on which faces are pretty and which are ugly. This implies that some underlying elements of facial beauty are universal. However, men aren't just searching for generically pretty faces. In fact, each man prefers a different and sometimes shockingly specific type of face.

I asked people to submit images of four faces they consider particularly attractive. Most chose faces that are unique, but also extremely similar to each other. Often so similar they could be mistaken for sisters, and occasionally so similar they could be mistaken for twins. You might not believe me yet, but you will after you see the example sets that follow.

Our first respondent chose four girls who look like sisters. The first two could almost be twins, and both of them are wearing glitter. Not just any glitter, but the same colors of glitter.

In the second example set we again have the impression of sisters. The first two are especially alike. When asked about this, the man who selected them replied:

Respondents consistently reported that they'd been unaware the faces they chose were similar. Some had trouble seeing obvious similarities even after they'd been explained. When it comes to our favorite faces, the sense of beauty seems to hamper our objectivity.

The girls in this third set couldn't be mistaken for sisters. In fact, they appear to have different ancestry. But while they're less obviously alike than the previous submissions, they still share common features.

The first two models have the same brow, eyes, cheeks, mouth, jawline, and chin. The fourth model is more similar to the first than she initially appears. When we superimpose photos taken at the same angle, their features match up so exactly that they create the impression of a single face.

And when we put two sets side by side, the differences are stark. It's incredibly easy to tell which faces belong together.

In the next set the first three faces are again similar in shape. They're all facing the camera directly and tilting their heads at the same angle. The image below superimposes two of them. Although one face is more elongated than the other, their features match.

They're also wearing the same expression. If you examine the previous examples again, you'll notice the faces there are wearing the same expressions too.

We see a slight smile in the first set, a tough glare in the second set, a sad pout in the third set, and a questioning gaze with parted lips in the fourth set.

One respondent included these three photos of women smiling in an identical fashion. The first two also have similar features, similar hairstyles, and similar poses.

Another submission included the two photos above, featuring a unique lopsided grin. The expression doesn't occur in any of the other examples, but this respondent chose it twice.

What's interesting about the next set is that the respondent selected four women from different parts of the world, but still managed to find two with both the same expression and the same face. The second is simply a wider version of the first.

Where facial preferences are concerned, matching features are more consistently important than matching ancestry. You can see another example of this below. Despite different origins, these four faces share very wide cheekbones, the same jaw and chin, the same hair, and noses of the same length.

Some respondents were sensitive to the mood of the images they chose. They submitted high-quality photographs with an artistic color scheme. Yet the first three faces in the tasteful black, white, and sepia photographs below are no less similar than the blurry selfies we examined earlier. In fact, this attention to aesthetic detail increases the impression of sameness.

You might assume the examples I've selected above are exceptional, but that isn't the case. Similar faces are the norm, and sister faces are common. Only a minority of submissions included four faces that were markedly different.

The faces in eclectic sets are frequently celebrities, so it's not unreasonable to imagine that external factors like laziness, the easy availability of photos, or the aura of fame sometimes motivated the choices. Still, we shouldn't rule out the possibility that they reveal genuine preferences. Some men may not have a "type."

One reader contacted me to say he didn't agree with my theory about faces. He argued the evidence was weak. So I asked him to submit his own set. Here's what he chose.

When I pointed out the similarities between his first two faces, he still disagreed. He told me the hands were a coincidence and the remaining two faces were actually very different, and submitted a new photo of the third face. To his mind, this new photo showed the resemblance was an illusion. Was he correct? I'll let you be the judge.

The preceding sections of this article demonstrated that most men share a common taste for the same female body shape. Bodily attractiveness is often as simple as having a smaller waist and larger breasts than other women. This is a very unromantic conclusion that suggests individuality has no relevance to feminine beauty.

Below the neck, that conclusion isn't entirely false. Minority tastes do exist, but they're not very specific either. And because of unequal supply and demand, stereotypically desirable traits still end up being the most advantageous in practice.

Where faces are concerned, a much different picture emerges. As we've acknowledged, men usually agree on which faces are ugly and which are pretty. But they aren't just seeking any pretty face. They each have an individual taste for a specific ideal face that very few women match. And the face that's perfect to one man may be quite uninteresting to another. So much so that the man who compiled set three wouldn't bother pursuing any of the women in sets one and two. That's a very significant effect!

At this point you might be thinking, "Fine. I'm convinced men really do have weirdly specific visual tastes. But women aren't like that. Women mainly care about status and narrative." Not true. Female submissions show the same pattern.

This female respondent submitted three faces that could belong to brothers, as well as a fourth half-brother. The first two are especially close, including the style of facial hair and squinting eyes.

This second female respondent drew on radically different sources but still came up with a complete set of brothers. The second and third faces could almost be twins and are posing at the same angle with the same expression and the same hair. When submitting these faces she wrote, "It's partially the physical attractiveness, but much more so everything else surrounding them (character, story, status etc.) that makes them stand out."

No objective observer could draw that conclusion. Certainly such factors influenced her selection. But even taking into account their shared ancestry, these are extraordinarily similar faces on a purely visual level. Her self-analysis implies that our unique facial preferences influence us subconsciously.

If we're each seeking specific and uncommon faces, good matches are rare and special, and effectively determined in advance. So the romantic idea that relationships are both individualized and predestined isn't far from the truth. Strangely enough, we go through life completely unaware of this, and invent other justifications for our choices. The right faces seem so meaningful to us that we can't believe we loved them because of an arbitrary visual preference.

In sum, to catch a mate it's not enough to be beautiful. You need to match his taste. If someone is indifferent to you, it doesn't necessarily mean that you're plain or have an unlikeable personality. You may just not have the right face for him. In such cases it's best to accept fate and move on.

These facts about faces are important and clear up many mysteries about beauty and romance. They should be made common knowledge. Yet as far as I'm aware, this is the first time they've been systematically explained.

You may wonder why I’ve declined to provide a more detailed analysis of advantageous facial traits. The wide variation in men's preferences isn't the only reason for this omission.

It's often easy to see what distinguishes a bad face from a good face. But determining which factors differentiate an average face from an excellent face is another matter.

The best faces aren't just better in two or three simple traits. They're slightly better in many small, interrelated dimensions. Nose shape, frequently targeted by surgeons, is only the most obvious. These many dimensions of facial beauty are hard to identify and measure, and eyeballing it based on rough rules of thumb simply isn’t enough.

In the past women who wanted to improve their faces had to trust a cosmetic surgeon's professional opinion and hope for the best. But today we can also make use of AI.

Because AI can easily calculate a huge number of dimensions, it’s very useful for the analysis of faces. With this technology at our disposal, writing up a meticulous analysis of every facial feature would be a waste of effort. I'll elaborate further when I discuss cosmetic surgery in the second half of this article, where I'll also address noses in particular.

VIII. A note on masculine beauty

The truth about masculine beauty isn't obscure, and the lies are few in number. There's therefore no special need for an in-depth article on the topic. However, this section will provide useful context for our observations on feminine beauty, as well as an opportunity to discuss age gaps in detail. You can skip it if you'd like.

Generic romance-novel covers repeat an almost identical male physique over and over. And although the artistic quality of cover art has declined sharply, the physiques depicted in modern romance novels and vintage ones from fifty years ago are almost identical. So it's reasonable to assume these idealized images are a good starting point for understanding masculine beauty. Indeed, romance-cover heroes are closely analogous to AI girls.

Most academic research suggests that height, upper-body strength, and penis size are the main factors in masculine bodily attractiveness. This time more reliable sources like novels, stereotypes, and sex dolls corroborate the professors' claims, in direction if not in degree. Naturally a healthy weight is assumed to precede these three factors. Women also tend to prefer men who are older than them.

Height is so simple that there's very little to say about it. But men do sometimes overlook the value of relative height. Short men will obviously have more success with short women. Tall men should keep in mind that their natural advantage is multiplied where tall women are concerned, because these are reluctant to date men of average height. Since they're competing with a smaller pool of suitors, tall men can expect a higher success rate if they make it a priority to approach tall women.

A common beauty mistake men make is to imagine that raw muscle size is a cure-all. Precisely determining the optimum build is a difficult problem I don't intend to tackle here. If you're weaker than the men shown in this section, adding muscle should improve your attractiveness to the average woman. Even so, it's only one factor among many. Most romance cover models are less bulky than top bodybuilders. Abs appear to be especially important in men with smaller muscles.

Sex dolls marketed as “for women” typically have physiques that resemble those of the Korean actors above, and are slimmer than romance-novel cover models. Stubble or facial hair is the norm, chest hair is common, and all have six- or eight-pack abs. Despite the marketing, some male sex dolls are clearly being purchased by men, so their value as evidence is uncertain. And as I explained earlier, economic factors encourage manufacturers to make sex dolls as narrow as they can get away with. That means romance-novel cover heroes, like AI girls, are probably more accurate exemplars of ideal bulk.

When does masculine beauty peak? The fictional magic in vampire romances allows us to separate physical appearance from other factors that make older heroes appealing. Despite chronological age gaps that extend to hundreds of years, they normally look mid twenties to early forties, with occasional outliers. Male sex dolls, as we've just seen, tend to look thirtysomething. We can therefore locate peak masculine beauty somewhere in the thirties. Thirty-four is a reasonable estimate. The exact number will of course vary from person to person.

It's not controversial to say that women prefer men who are older than them, and that masculine beauty peaks later than feminine beauty. And thirty-four and twenty-two are widely accepted as approximate ages of peak beauty. But the fact that there's a twelve-year gap between these two ages is another matter. Because age gaps are the subject of beauty lies inspired by wishful thinking and misguided moralizing, I'm going to discuss them in detail.

In vintage romance novels a fifteen- or twenty-year age gap is common. Substantial age gaps occur frequently in recent romances too. Some protest that only old men find large age gaps desirable, and only old women read novels that feature them. But as I demonstrate in the gallery below, neither claim is true.

Romance novels also contradict the popular idea that the maximum desirable gap increases with absolute age, sometimes known as the "half-your-age-plus-seven rule." The heroines are often in their early twenties, or even late teens, clearly violating the so-called rule. (It has no empirical basis, and isn't a rule. It just sounds clever because it includes the number seven.)

Nevertheless, there are several reasons to be wary of this evidence. First, it's important to acknowledge that while there are many women who enjoy romantic stories with age gaps, there are also some who aren't so keen.

Second, the large age gaps women imagine in fiction are contradicted not only by their self-reports, but everyday reality as well. In dating apps, the average woman requests a maximum age gap of eight years. In surveys women say they prefer an even smaller age gap. Most marriages involve a gap of less than five years, and the modal relationship has hardly any age gap at all.

Why might the age gaps women choose in reality be so much smaller than those common in fantasies? The ideal man accrues more experience, confidence, ability, gravitas, status, power, and wealth over time, and these give signs of age a positive meaning, so younger men look callow in comparison. Of course, he ages well on a raw physical level too. In contrast, the average man today accrues less or none of these things, and ages poorly on a raw physical level.

People also interact more with their same-age cohort, which makes same-age relationships more probable whether or not they're ideal. Men don't wait till they're thirty to start looking for women, so most desirable older men are already taken. And social pressures play a role as well, perhaps against the best interests of individuals.

Let's set romance novels aside now and consider fundamentals. The chart below illustrates how age gaps affect relationships as time passes. “Peak gap” refers to the amount of time between peak feminine and peak masculine beauty, while “age gap” refers to the difference between two lovers' ages. Reality is more complicated than this simple model, but it still shows the general pattern.

As you can see from the first row, although relationships with small age gaps satisfy both men and women equally in their late twenties, men become less satisfied than women as those relationships continue. This isn't because women age faster than men, as conventional wisdom would have it. It's simply because they peak earlier. The illusion that women age faster comes about because most relationships begin before the second peak. This sets up a decline in the woman's beauty relative to the man's, since she'll move away from her peak as he moves closer to his.

When young women are in relationships with very big gaps, as shown on the second row of the chart, the reverse happens. Women become less satisfied than men as these relationships continue. So a twenty-two-year gap can be just as problematic as a two-year gap.

However, when the age gap matches the peak gap, both lovers remain equally satisfied as they get older. And that holds no matter when their relationship begins or how long it lasts. You can see this on the third row of the chart.

I've estimated the peak gap at twelve years here, but to avoid giving the impression this is a precision measurement, I'm going to call it a half-generation. Since a generation is roughly twenty to thirty years, a half-generation is in the neighborhood of ten to fifteen. As I've already pointed out, most men and women today age poorly, and for any given real couple the peak gap may be greater or lesser. But the same logic still holds. The closer the age gap is to the peak gap, the better it is for the relationship.

At present small or even nonexistent age gaps are widely touted as more egalitarian, and therefore more morally correct. It should now be clear that the opposite is true. They're less egalitarian. And if you insist on moralizing, they're therefore less morally correct too. The inequalities just arise gradually after a delay, so they're hard to distinguish from general dissatisfaction. They may even lead to divorces, affairs, or mid-life crises that will be blamed on other causes. In truth, they're scheduled from the start, invisibly and regardless of what the couple wanted or expected. Matching the age gap to the peak gap is the only way to avoid baking in this kind of trouble.

Some will be offended by the unconventional conclusion that a half-generation age gap is ideal. But the math is what it is. 34-22=12. If you know how to subtract 22 from 34 and come up with a number more acceptable than 12, be my guest. As we've already seen, this is the kind of age gap many women fantasize about anyway. That makes objecting seem rather absurd, even if you do find a new way to do math.

Later on I'll discuss what aging women in relationships with small gaps can do to keep their lovers satisfied to the extent possible. But for now I'll just repeat that this article is about beauty. It's not intended as holistic relationship advice. People have many other reasons for choosing relationships. In real life, practicality and convenience often trump theoretical ideals, and rightly so. The age gap that best equalizes beauty over time isn't necessarily the best age gap when the bigger picture is taken into account.

Let's pull everything together before we move on. Age gaps of up to twenty years do fall within the normal range of female tastes, whether or not they're to everyone's liking. In theory, a half-generation age gap makes the most sense, and should be widely popular. In reality, however, it isn't, partly because few men live up to the ideal, and partly for practical reasons.

Small age gaps are the commonest today, and they're what the average man should plan on. Commonness obviously doesn't fix the fundamental inequalities I've explained above, but you'll just have to find a way to deal with them. It's also imprudent to assume you'll "age like wine." Some do, most don't. This may be demoralizing. Yet until we develop a cure, the truth about age will continue to irritate both men and women alike.

Where individual relationships are concerned, I advise you not to take theories about age gaps too seriously (including mine). Just judge each relationship on its own merits. You may not realize you don't really care about age gaps until you meet the right person.

Let's resume our analysis of masculine beauty with some less fraught observations.

Short hair doesn't have the strongly negative effect on men that it has on women. However, very short hair is still detrimental. Romance-novel cover models rarely have hair less than a few inches long, and none are balding. Medium-length hair is common, and long hair occurs more often than you might expect, although usually in a historical context. Today men tend to wear their hair a little shorter than they should. Consult the images in this section for a rough guide to attractive hair length.

Penis size is a particularly sensitive subject for many men. So in public women will often lie about the size they prefer, dodge the question, or at least understate their tastes. As usual, those with the most extreme tastes are the most likely to lie. Men should forgive them, because they tell the same lies for the same reasons when discussing breast size.

Below you can read a private discussion among women. I'm not presenting this as a typical conversation. It's an anecdotal example intended to shake the preconceptions of men who believe women are less demanding or judgmental than men in their physical preferences. In fact they can be quite brutal.

What penis size do women really prefer? I've gathered data using the same methodology I employed when researching breast size. You can see the results below.

The taste isn't universal, but "large" is clearly the most popular size. For a more precise answer, I manually counted up all the realistic dildos at a single retailer. Previous studies of dildo size have arrived at lower numbers by including vibrators and unrealistic dildos in their sample, but that's a poor method for obvious reasons.

The average realistic dildo also measures 5.6" in circumference, 1.9 standard deviations above the global mean of 4.7" (Western mean 4.8"). From this data we can make the following observations:

• Only 1% of women want less than five inches.
• 80% of women want seven inches or more.
• The average woman wants eight inches.
• 33% of women want nine inches or more.
• The average realistic dildo is 2.4" longer and double the volume of the average real penis.

We can't assume these dildo statistics transfer exactly to reality, of course. But we don't need to. The gap is so substantial that larger members will have an economic advantage even if dildo sizes overstate real preferences by a considerable margin. In practice, penis size is another case of bigger is better.

Some will argue that evidence derived from the sex toy business doesn't represent what women really want. Below you can see the results of an anonymous internet poll. Polls are unreliable, but this one gives remarkably similar answers to the research presented above. Romance novels, stereotypes, and even science tell the same basic story. And let's face it: the idea that women are buying toys they don't enjoy is pretty implausible.

With cosmetic surgery and good weight management, women can increase their breast size by four cups or more. Men, on the other hand, have essentially no ability to control their size. So why bother publishing this data? To put an end to hypocrisy, finger-pointing, and denialism about beauty, and show that men and women are more alike in their preferences than is commonly acknowledged. The battle of the sexes is a negative-sum game we shouldn't be playing. Put down your rhetorical weapons and try to build mutually fulfilling relationships instead.

Below I've made a composite of these two charts. We can easily see that there's a close analogy between women's penis size preferences and men's breast size preferences. For instance, an A-cup is equivalent to a four-inch penis, a B-cup is equivalent to a five-inch penis, and an H-cup is equivalent to a nine-inch penis. This "translation" may help you to understand and accept the tastes of the opposite sex.

The comparison reveals that both sexes prefer partners who are very far above the mean. That shouldn't be surprising at all. Why wouldn't they? But since humans are flawed and insecure, they rely on lies, complaints, and accusations to cover over uncomfortable truths, no matter how natural and obvious they might be. Women who feel hurt or offended by men's beauty preferences ought to stop and look in the mirror.

A more remarkable conclusion we can draw from this data is that around a third of the people you'll meet today are attracted to extravagant sizes hardly ever found in reality. This applies to both genders. A number of women even want a penis size that's expected to occur in fewer than one out of a hundred billion men.

Some people have trouble accepting that preferences for scarce or impossible traits not only exist, but are normal. It seems to irk their moral sense even more than their pride. What they want is to live in a world where the real is already the ideal, or close to it. But not only is that not the case, it fundamentally can't be the case. I'll explain the reason for this later on.

Poorly endowed men shouldn't obsess over their size. There are many factors that influence attractiveness. A disadvantage in one trait won't prevent you from building a successful relationship. To put this in perspective, consider that a small penis and a flat chest are about equally popular with the opposite sex. But no one believes flat girls can't find love. You can find it too.

In practice, penis size is less important than breast size, because it doesn't affect your clothed appearance. Since advertising is the first and most important step for finding a mate, the practical utility of a trait you can't advertise is limited. Never let on that your size bothers you. Instead, project confidence and win her over with other traits. The ability to maintain an aura of strength despite your weaknesses is a key masculine virtue.

Male readers are hoping I'll conclude this section with tricks that will help them to catch women. I'd very much like to. However, the facts compel me to advise fatalism.

Of the three main factors in male bodily attractiveness, only muscular strength is under your control, and even that to a limited degree. Fashions are bland, and makeup is out of the question. There are some effective options for facial cosmetic surgery that I haven't time to discuss here. But overall, men's ability to improve the appearance they inherited is considerably less than women's.

Men looking for a magic solution to this limitation sometimes turn to pick-up artist “game” (a collection of psychological tricks for seducing women). I won't claim that game is false.

However, the effect size is limited, and those who peddle it are often guilty of overpromising. The next time you walk down a busy street, observe the couples. They have a similar level of purely physical attractiveness. If psychological tricks could really cancel out a poor appearance, this wouldn't be the case. The exceptions are so rare and noticeable that they prove the rule, and they typically involve large sums of money.

I'll leave men with a short list of advice.

The third point in the list deserves special emphasis, because today many otherwise decent young men neglect it and suffer the consequences. When you approach women in your league, rejections will be more common than matches, and there's no way to avoid this with premeditation and calculation. To optimize your outcome you must have the courage to repeatedly put your self-esteem at risk, and persist despite the inevitable demoralizing rejections. If you do not do this and instead aim to minimize rejections, you'll underperform your potential.

Rejection isn't always genuine, but sometimes a test to see if you'll insist. By insisting, you demonstrate that your interest isn't fickle, and also make her feel more desirable. Whether a rejection is definitive or leaves the door open to further courtship is something you'll need to decide with good judgment. It's also smart to know when to stop.

As a side note, fantasies of dominance and violence are much more common among women than men. In fact, they don't even make the top fifteen list of men's fantasies. Women aren't aware of this gap, and those who project a lust for sexual violence onto men in order to enhance their own jouissance don't really want to be aware. Some women may expect you to engage in a theater of dominance that doesn't come naturally, and even detracts from your enjoyment. Whether you choose to indulge them is up to you.

IX. "Beauty" and "hotness"

Some women make a fuss over a purported conflict between platonic “beauty” and visceral “hotness.” They're afraid too much sex appeal will make them less beautiful. They may even fear an overtly attractive body will harm their reputation, whether or not their behavior is virtuous. This is a mistake. It's best to have all the good things together.

For your inspiration, I asked men to send me images they consider both hot and beautiful. I've presented their submissions unfiltered and unedited in the galleries featured in this section.

Platonic beauty and hotness might be distinct. But they don't detract from each other. They complement and enhance each other. “Feminine beauty,” as I discuss it in the rest of this article, comprises both.

Public discussion tends to emphasize platonic beauty over sex appeal because it sounds more respectable. Consequently, an honest account like the one you're now reading will appear to do the reverse.

There are serious disadvantages to having a type of beauty that lacks sex appeal. You'll be put on a pedestal like an antique art object. Praised and even sought after, but not truly desired. You may even become a victim of infidelity. That's not a fulfilling state of affairs. It's in your own self-interest to pursue the full complement of feminine attractiveness.

Other women may try to deter you from being as hot as you are beautiful. But you should be aware they're engaging in intrasexual competition. By convincing you to handicap yourself, they reduce the chance you could poach their mates or potential mates. By denigrating attractive traits, they confuse and demoralize the naturally gifted. Even your friends might do this unconsciously.

The illusion that beauty and hotness are in conflict is partly a result of social norms restricting the acknowledgement of genuine feminine sex appeal—even at a time when sexualization seems ubiquitous. And it's partly a consequence of the statistical probabilities that govern the selection of models. A model chosen for erotically charged traits will likely be average in other traits, and therefore plainer than models selected purely for their facial beauty. The converse is also true. This might appear to imply a tradeoff or contradiction, but it doesn't. It's just chance.

This same principle applies to less tangible elements of aesthetics as well, such as a model's fashion sense, or the technical and artistic quality of her photographs.

The notion that there are always tradeoffs between good things is a lie we tell ourselves to support the flattering illusion that our faults are, in some larger sense, not faults at all. But aesthetics isn't a roleplaying game where each player gets a set number of points and distributes them, so that one point here means fewer points elsewhere. Nicer hair doesn't come at the cost of uglier toenails.

This vintage centerfold (NSFW) is a striking example of beautiful eroticism. The model's extravagant chest does no harm to her prettiness, which is photographed in a style reminiscent of pre-Raphaelite painting. There's simply no meaningful aesthetic tradeoff for being hot.

There is, however, a meaningful social tradeoff for dressing in clothes that portray you as easily available. While they attract more men, they also deter the best long-term partners. Some women observe this and conclude that hotness itself deters the best partners, and it's better to be average than stunning, or even shun sex appeal altogether. But that's the wrong conclusion. Slutty fashions deter the best partners because they suggest you won't be faithful, not because hotness and beauty are fundamentally in conflict.

The photos men submitted for this section indeed show fashions that are hot and beautiful, but not all of them are appropriate for every context. When you're searching for a mate it's important to select styles that signal your fidelity and your broader value. This doesn't mean you need to dress conservatively, let alone intentionally make yourself plain. It's possible to look sexy without looking promiscuous, easy, or cheap. I'll offer more examples in the beauty tips at the end of this article.

Take some time to look closely at these galleries of images submitted by men. The makeup, clothes, lighting, and even scenery are aesthetically appealing. Each model has an individual character. Feminine sexual traits are indispensable, of course. But men have a finer and more holistic sensibility than you would assume if you judged their tastes on the basis of today's typically ugly pornography.

Don't let yourself be trapped in an aesthetic Madonna-whore complex. The distinction between platonic beauty and hotness is rarely useful, and best forgotten. Instead, embrace an undivided feminine beauty and enjoy together all the good things life has to offer.

X. Correcting homework

I gave my female readers a simple homework assignment. I asked them to submit images they believed would receive the most positive votes when men were polled on how attractive they are. As we discussed earlier, popularity is different from value. However, it's still important to understand what most men like well enough that you can provide accurate examples.

All the women who participated were familiar with this article. But a surprising thing happened. Almost none of them submitted images that match the ideals described in it. Naturally, their submissions received mediocre ratings from male voters. And we don't need to rely on survey results to know they fall short of the mark. Anyone who compares them to the beauty examples elsewhere in this article will see they don't match.

There's only one possible explanation for such a strange outcome. Most women have a psychological block about acknowledging what men find attractive. They can read thousands of words and yet still choose the wrong answer.

The main source of this block is fragile vanity. Because women's self-esteem and erotic satisfaction depend on feeling desirable, they try to see themselves as desirable even when they're not confident it's true. This impairs their ability to reflect objectively on attractiveness so much that ideally attractive women disappear into a mental blind spot. It also fills them with an unstable mix of self-doubt and self-aggrandizement.

So they bounce back and forth between excesses of pride and feelings of worthlessness, always searching for confirmation that's never lastingly convincing. Fragile vanity is an emotional rollercoaster from which only the truth can set you free, but it also makes the truth the hardest thing to see.

The cause of the psychological block, however, can't be reduced to vanity alone. Women tend to conflate status and beauty into a single goal we might call “beautus.” When the media and fashion marketers bombard them with deceptive messages portraying unattractive traits as high status and attractive traits as low status, the contradiction blinds them to genuine beauty in its fullest flower.

Some compound the problem with a Madonna-whore complex, wrongly viewing sexual traits as shameful and dirty. This programming is hard to reverse, because it starts at a young age.

Our purpose here, obviously, is to enable rewarding romantic relationships, not to encourage prostitution. To help you see clearly without selling your body, I'll go over submissions in detail and explain why they weren't successful. I'll need to be harshly critical, but keep in mind that the intention is to instruct, not to be cruel for the sake of it.

Before you continue, find an image yourself. For this particular assignment, your task isn't to pick something to your own taste or your boyfriend's taste, but to correctly guess what the largest number of men will find attractive. After you've done your homework, continue reading to see if your answer was right. If not, you can try again as many times as you like.

Despite a pretty face and blonde hair, the submission above scored poorly. The faults here are many. First, the model's hair is short. Men prefer long hair, and indeed very long hair will perform best. Second, her chest is nearly flat. Men strongly dislike a flat chest. Her legs and butt are also quite thin. Some women feel irate that men don't appreciate this look as much as they believe they should. But the facts are the facts. It's simply not what men want.

The next image also scored poorly. The model's clothing is obscuring the most important signals of attractiveness, namely her waist, breasts, and hips. This already ensures she won't register as attractive. Her hair is again too short. Her legs are again on the thin side, and looking at the photo one mainly has an impression of calf muscles. These have little effect on men, who are more attracted to thighs than calves, and typically not excited by muscles.

This model is older than men consider optimal. That doesn't mean she's ugly, but it does mean she won't get a top score. Her breasts aren't especially small, but they're not big enough to be popular. Furthermore, her waist and hips aren't visible. Concealing them reduces attractiveness.

The image above had a mediocre score for two main reasons. First, the model looks heavier in the belly than the average man today wants. Second, her very large rear is her most salient feature. Because men disagree about the best butt size, women with big butts underperform in polls. As explained previously, this doesn't mean big butts aren't attractive. They are. But due to the diversity of opinions, they don't win popularity contests. A medium-sized butt with a full, round shape is the most broadly popular, because everyone likes it reasonably well.

This image had a good but not fantastic score. The model lost points because her hair is too short, her chest is too small, her waist isn't clearly visible, and her legs are unremarkable. But her expression is a little more charming than the previous models, and blonde hair seems to add a few extra points, as some men strongly prefer it.

The model above received a good but not fantastic rating. Her appeal is limited primarily because she doesn't have a true hourglass figure. Her waist should be smaller relative to her ribcage, and her breasts should be larger. Extra-large breasts receive both higher positive and lower negative ratings than medium-sized breasts like these. That's because a significant fraction of the men who appear to prefer small breasts are actually just indifferent to size. Faces are subjective, but hers is perhaps not in the first rank. Last but by no means least, tattoos reduce attractiveness.

This is the most popular model initially submitted by female readers. She has a better figure than any of the previous models and predictably performed well. Her thicker thighs contribute to her appeal. So do her youthfulness and playfully seductive expression and posture. With a prettier face and more pronounced hourglass, she would have performed even better.

The next images weren't submitted by women. Instead they're examples of the kind of images that receive high ratings from men.

To get past a psychological block and understand feminine beauty, you need to accept that the typical man's preferences really are exactly as this article has described them. The top-scoring images look extremely similar. This is not an accident. There's a generic look that consistently wins popularity contests, and this is it.

Before you continue reading, compare the next two images. Try to guess the rating of the left image, and explain why men might not like it as much as the right image. Then check your answer below.

Many women consider the figure at left ideal. In public everyone will tell her she's perfect and shouldn't change anything. And men will agree, because if they tell the truth in mixed company they'll seem vulgar and impolite, and make women angry. But while the model at left is pretty, she's just not very exciting. She's too thin and her chest is barely a B-cup. Her butt has a good shape, but less volume than the median male prefers, and one can't see her hips. Her thighs lack volume too. Left is what people say is perfect, but right is what most men actually want.

To reiterate, men want a young woman with a small waist, wide hips, large breasts (much larger than you think), a rounded rear with good projection (for maximum popularity, neither too small nor too large), a pretty face, makeup (not overdone), long hair (about waist length), and properly fitted clothing. Any woman who covers all these points will receive a warm response from eighty to ninety percent of men even if other details aren't perfect. The models female readers initially submitted failed to do so.

However, when women were coached and allowed to repeatedly submit new images for ratings, some of them quickly learned how to select models just as popular as those chosen by men.

After this coaching I arranged a contest where a girls' team competed with a boys' team to choose the most highly rated images. Remarkably, the girls' team won. The image above was one of their winning choices. This proves it's entirely possible to overcome a psychological block and understand men's tastes if you're willing to make the effort.

To confirm your understanding, do another little homework assignment. Ignore your intuitions entirely. Instead, force yourself to search for one image that fits exactly the description of a generically attractive woman given a few paragraphs above. You may have to overcome an innate aversion, but you can succeed if you try.

Naturally this is only an exercise. Popularity isn't the same as value. So after you've learned how to satisfy the crowd, broaden your view by finding images that fulfill the minority tastes discussed elsewhere in this article. Don't assume you understand what you've read here until you've finished all your homework.

XI. Drawing the right conclusions

It's unfortunately common for women who read this article to draw the wrong conclusions from it. Realizing they'll never attain the ideal form desired by men, they react by rejecting the ideal, rejecting men, or even rejecting themselves. Women are sensitive to any criticism of their appearance, so this emotional reaction is understandable. But it's also very foolish.

Imperfection is part of being human, not a reason to hate yourself. If you always get a perfect score, this only means you're being given tests that are too easy.

A beauty ideal actually needs to be unattainable. If it were attainable, it wouldn't be useful for discriminating between the best potential mates, since all of them would have attained it. That's why a gap between the ideal and the real is fundamental to our sense of sexual aesthetics, and not something that can be argued away. At times this manifests itself as a taste for unreachable extremes, the simplest of which we've examined above.

So not only is there no shame in falling short of the ideal, it's actually expected that everyone will fall short in one way or another. This isn't your fault nor men's.

In the present day there's a strong push to deal with human shortcomings by lowering or eliminating ideals and standards. All sorts of sophistical arguments are put forth to accomplish the destruction. This race to the bottom isn't motivated only by the resentment of the least successful. It's also happening because our society has, by and large, forgotten grace. High ideals are more psychologically sustainable when they're accompanied by forgiveness for humans who fail to meet them.

A gap between the ideal and the real is a condition of possibility for our aspirations to make the world a better place. So if the truth about beauty is difficult for you to accept, don't join the mob set on erasing ideals. Don't listen to dishonest flattery you'll never really believe. Instead of lies, seek grace. And remember that love neither requires nor expects perfection.

What's the right way to use the information you've just learned? By understanding the truth about feminine beauty, you can target your efforts to improve your appearance more accurately and stop wasting energy running in the wrong direction. The truth won't ensure you reach the ideal, but it will help you to get the most out of your innate potential. That's the topic of the second half of this article.

And in truth, there's no such thing as “ideal” feminine beauty. Men's preferences vary. Unusual women who don't suit the average taste can be highly valued. The most popular look isn't necessarily the best. All this makes it both easy to misrepresent a seemingly straightforward analysis, and impossible to explain it accurately in a few words.

Nevertheless, it's best to conclude neatly. The cartoon below is a fair representation of the most widely loved appearance. For lack of better, it can serve as a concise, oversimplified summary of our findings.

If you feel you've learned something from this free article, consider making a donation here. Dispelling Beauty Lies is the most comprehensive and accurate analysis of feminine beauty ever produced, and researching, writing, and promoting it took years. And—you're only halfway done.

XII. Reality-based beauty tips

The second half of this article consists of no-nonsense, reality-based beauty tips. Many of them will be familiar. But since you now know the truth about feminine beauty, you can reconsider them with a fresh perspective. The basics of beautification aren’t magic. This advice will work for anyone, including you. (Male readers may want to skip this section and hold on to their illusions.)

Don’t be discouraged because the ideal body of a love goddess is out of reach. Modest improvements still help. Giving up on the game of beauty because you can’t win first place is a mistake. In fact, average-looking girls benefit more from improving their appearance than naturally gifted women do.

It’s also a mistake to rely entirely on your personality and intelligence to sell you as a mate. This is like trying to win a triathlon without learning how to swim. Instead, use your intelligence to improve your appearance. If you follow all the advice below, you might gain three points on the beauty scale. That's the difference between a six and a nine.

More and more women are trapped in a game mass marketing has created for them, and men only have a token role in it. Indeed, women today have been trained to value the tastes of celebrity spokesmodels above those of their lovers. So they spend time and money on fashion with little to show for it, competing with each other to chase arbitrary targets for no discernable reward. This trend is encouraged by businesses, who exploit rhetoric about "independence" to replace love with dependence on consumerism.

Most women are too prideful to admit they've been fooled and change direction. But their loss can be your gain. There's plenty of room to increase your romantic success and strengthen your relationships if you ignore the chorus of lies and make an effort to apply your new understanding.

The stakes are higher now than ever. Today men are increasingly seduced by egirls who hook them with a combination of personal charm, virtual stripteases, and powerful AI effects. While real women have been wasting their time reading Vogue, shopping for handbags, and copying Hollywood actresses, these online strippers have weaponized the truth about feminine beauty. And that's not all. Egirls, escorts, and startups designing AI girlfriends have studied this very article to optimize their techniques.

They'll use every trick in the book to hack men's brains and lock them in a world of virtual sex and imaginary relationships. As I explain in my essay on ultrahumanism, even desirable men are vulnerable. So please don't hold back. Apply the advice below, and beat them at their own game. You'll do us all good.

1. Finding the best weight for you.
2. Clothing and fashion.
3. Cosmetics and cosmetic surgery.
4. Hair, skin, and eyes.
5. Motion and posture.
6. The most common misconception about seduction.
7. Personality and individuality.
8. Beauty and aging.
9. The top seven ways to look more attractive.

1. Finding the best weight for you.

Excess weight harms your appearance and your health. In fact, weight is the single most important element of beauty under your control. But that doesn’t mean anorexia or obsessive dieting are advantageous.

The examples in this article show that a healthy, slim weight is best, but not less. Minimizing bodyfat by undereating won't maximize attractiveness. In fact, it will actually make you less attractive.

Trolls tell attractive women they're overweight just for the joy of causing pain. You need to learn to ignore them and focus on the facts. When men can choose any bodyfat level they want, as in an erotic drawing, they don't choose a skeletal figure. The image below was the most popular drawing of the day on an anime image site.

In erotic drawings and AI-generated images, girls without curves are always depicted as juvenile, never tall and narrow in the manner of fashion models.

When it comes to waist size, smaller is better. But when it comes to feminine curves, bigger is better. Because these goals conflict, you need to aim for a weight that compromises between the two. Simply dieting to chase the smallest waist size is counterproductive, because it fails badly at the second goal.

Losing too much weight shrinks your bust, hips, thighs, and rear more than your waist and arms, and the overall effect becomes negative. The tradeoff isn't worth it.

You should avoid losing too much weight even if you have breast implants, because extremely low bodyfat will typically make them look more artificial.

The optimal weight for attractiveness depends on your personal bodyfat distribution, not an arbitrary number we can predetermine. The better your bodyfat distribution, the more you benefit from a few extra pounds. The worse your bodyfat distribution, the more important it is to stay slim. To clarify I'll go over a series of examples, starting with the thinnest.

The top fashion model below looks both too thin and too masculine, with no feminine softness at all. A visibly muscular abdomen is unattractive to most men. This is certainly not the best weight for her body. Even if you don't carry weight well, you shouldn't copy her physique.

If you have a poor bodyfat distribution (i.e. fat goes to your belly more than your hips, chest, rear, or thighs), adding weight will do more harm than good, and staying rather thin is indeed the best choice. However, don't judge your ideal weight entirely by your arm circumference. Men do prefer thin arms, but they're relatively unimportant. If only your arms are too thick, ignore them and aim for an attractive weight elsewhere, then wear long sleeves more often.

Don't overdo it. Men who prefer thin women still dislike skeletons. The model below has a thin but healthy and attractive figure. You should never aim to be thinner than this.

Here's another model with an unspectacular bodyfat distribution. In this case gaining weight would do harm. But losing weight would eliminate the minimal curves she has and do harm as well. For instance, the difference between a flat chest and a small B-cup is very important to men. If you can make that difference with good weight management, you should.

You might feel intimidated by the curvaceous figures praised in this article because you don't have the genetics or surgical budget to imitate them effectively. However, as the example above shows, most women have some attractive curves when they optimize their weight. That said, a few unlucky women will still end up with an A-cup. If you can't grow breasts without also growing a fatter middle than the right photo above, you should stay slim. Later on I'll discuss how you can build curves through artificial means.

At this link you can see a relatable fine arts model, presented unclothed, with no cosmetic surgery and poor lighting. Her physique is a good target for average women who are a little bottom-heavy. Most women assume she should lose a few pounds, but that would clearly reduce her resemblance to the reference anime girl, and her overall attractiveness as well. The gallery below shows another good weight goal for average women with an average bodyfat distribution.

Now let's consider some body types that benefit from higher weights. The AI-generated image below is an excellent example of a weight women fear is too much, but men find extremely attractive on the right person. For someone with this bodyfat distribution, a lower weight would reduce sex appeal.

The photo below is also instructive. This model has more belly fat than men typically want today. Yet because her chest is much larger than her waist, the net result is attractive even if it's not perfect. The average woman would look rather plain with the same amount of bodyfat, and should aim to be leaner. This unclothed video shows women who are also well endowed, but smaller and slimmer than the model below. Watch their midriffs. None of them need to lose weight. Despite significant bodyfat, their overall proportions are excellent, and they look more natural and smoothly blended than augmented women who are very lean.

A naturally attractive butt is a common casualty of excessive weight loss. If you tend to hold weight in your rear, remember that bigger is better, and don't squander your lucky genetics by dieting your butt away. This AI girl would be less attractive at a lower weight.

The bottom-heavy glamour model shown below has an excellent weight for her body type. There's no doubt that losing weight would make her less attractive.

How much is too much? The models in the next gallery, and others like them, were sent to me by men as examples of perfect butts. If your butt is expanding much faster than your waist, the extra weight is likely increasing your attractiveness even though your rear is already large. However, because men evaluate your proportions relative to your waist, an excessive waistline will eventually cancel out the value of a large rear or chest. To check whether your fat distribution is attractive, compare your own photo to the images.

The next AI girl illustrates the upper range of male taste. This weight only works for women with an unusually good bodyfat distribution that hardly ever occurs naturally. Provided that criterion is met, the majority of men will find it attractive, although most won't consider it ideal, and a minority will reject it outright. In any case you should never exceed this weight.

Finally, the AI girl below has a classical figure that's neither too thick nor too thin, and exemplifies beauty, class, and sex appeal at the same time. It's an excellent goal for women who have the body type to pull it off, but not everyone can. Know your limits and find the best weight for you.

Beauty lies aren't a victimless crime. Some women damage their health and happiness by obsessively seeking thinness. They congregate on social media and reinforce their delusions, making their mental illness harder to escape.

If you're “pro-anorexia,” it's time to reconsider your views. This article is the most honest and accurate analysis of feminine beauty you're going to find. You should take the data it presents seriously. Slimming down at the expense of beauty and health doesn't make sense, even if it impresses other girls who are making the same mistake. Stop hurting yourself and change direction.

In case it wasn't already evident, I'll point out explicitly that thigh gaps are not a useful target for determining your ideal weight. Whether you have a thigh gap at a given weight actually depends on the shape of your pelvis and femurs, making it meaningless even as an indicator. Nor is it a genuine element of beauty in itself. Recall that thick thighs are usually an attractive feature, not an unattractive one.

The body of scientific knowledge about diet that currently exists is low quality, inconclusive, and corrupted by the influence of vested interests and academic politics. Of course, that doesn't mean unscientific theories are reliable. For the time being there's just no way to know the healthiest diet with certainty. But what is certain is that a diet that's not working for you can't get any better if you don't change anything.

An ancestral diet is a reasonable starting point for improvement, and already enough for most women to maintain a healthy weight. Further specifics are unclear, and vary from person to person. Some seem to benefit from eating more protein and less fat (more lean meats), but others do best eating more fat and less protein and carbs (more fatty meats and oils). Some people have a high tolerance for carbs, others low. Some even thrive on a purely carnivorous diet.

To figure out what works for you, you’ll have to experiment over a long period of time. Eliminating carbs and seed oils entirely for several months and then trying to gradually add them back to your diet is one popular technique for finding a good balance. If you need to lose a lot of weight but you’re not sure where to start, you might want to test this first.

If you struggle with anorexia or body dysmorphia, it's important that you consume regular meals with a good balance of nutrients. Fasting or skipping meals can exacerbate psychological issues and even suppress your appetite, creating a vicious cycle of anxiety and undereating. Eat regularly even if you aren't hungry, and when you find yourself stuck in a mental loop, focus your mind on a distracting activity until it passes. Save the beauty examples from this article and remind yourself that you'll be unattractive if you're too thin.

Exercise is less important to maintain a healthy weight than diet, but still worth some effort.

As far as beauty is concerned, it's likely best to skip upper-body exercise entirely. Abs don't contribute to feminine beauty, broad shoulders are more negative than positive, and idealized imaginary women usually have thin and undeveloped arms regardless of how thick their bodies are. Instead, overdeveloping your glutes relative to the rest of your legs is advantageous.

In fact, a glutes-only strength-training regimen may actually be a good idea. Personal trainers and athletes will be appalled. But if you're training for beauty, real, “functional” strength isn't the goal. You want to improve your butt projection, not put muscle on display. Excessive bulking of the calves and thighs can be counterproductive for the rare women who add muscle easily.

For a minimal exercise routine, try doing just three sets of glutes-targeted resistance training three times a week, and no other weightlifting. For better health and fitness you can supplement this with rucking, or some other form of light exercise.

If you do choose to develop your thigh muscles, keep the ideal shape in mind. Thighs should thicken as they approach the hips, and taper as they approach the knees. Bulky rear thighs can reduce the appearance of butt projection. So thigh volume should be concentrated in the upper front, not distributed evenly.

While extra glutes training is beneficial, there are limits to what it can accomplish, and the typically achievable gains are sometimes exaggerated by the fitness community. Furthermore, the most attractive legs derive their shape primarily from fat, not muscle. The purpose of muscle is only to create the illusion of a more attractive fat distribution. Ideally, it should be hidden under a layer of fat.

Models with a large rear and attractively thick thighs may credit them to exercise, but genetics, good weight management, and surgery are the main causes. Don't assume training harder will give you a similar outcome.

2. Clothing and fashion.

Men don't have X-ray vision, so beautiful women in ill-fitted clothes can actually pass unnoticed for years, which is a very sad thing. The best men should be able to think past your clothes, but the truth is most are dumb and only notice what's on display.

Because men have such a strong preference for a small waist, you should always wear clothes that are fitted at the waist, not loose. This is especially true for women with a "monarchiste" body type. These clothes can be hard to find today, when most of the population is overweight.

Stretch fabrics or elastic bands are an easy shortcut solution, but sometimes a tailor is necessary. Don't skimp. It's well worth the money to have everything altered to match your personal measurements. In fact, wearing clothes off the rack without having them tailored is the most common reason curvaceous women fail to benefit from their gifts.

There are a few exceptions to the rule: very straight and thin women can do well with flowing clothes, and top-heavy women with a relatively thick middle may look best in an empire waist.

If you’re socially anxious and wear baggy or poorly fitted clothes to hide your body even though you have a healthy weight, please stop. There are better ways to be modest. Wear snug but high-necked shirts, and long skirts that are tightly fitted at the waist. These look modest but still allow people to notice that you have an attractive figure.

Of course, all things being equal, it’s best to dress to an average degree of modesty in the area where you live, with modifications based on the occasion. You’ll normally have the most success with good men if your clothing is neither particularly modest nor particularly immodest. That said, all things aren't necessarily equal. The sexier you are, the more careful your clothing choices should be.

It's obvious that sex appeal alone isn't enough to catch a high-quality man. It's also important to display trustworthiness and class.

Most women want to present themselves as desirable mates for high-quality men and avoid inviting attention from low-quality men. Today they typically solve this problem in ways that reduce their overall attractiveness. For instance, maintaining an excessively low bodyweight, and wearing fashionable but unappealing clothing.

This is a poor solution, and it's not the one women chose historically. It may signal class and deter undesirable men seeking quick sex. But in the same blow it reduces your attractiveness to the men you really do want, and reduces the amount of beauty in the world too.

In past times women signaled class with refined manners and elegant clothing that enhanced rather than reduced their feminine beauty. This clothing was designed to emphasize a curvaceous figure without inviting the wrong kind of attention. So while women's default solution today requires a costly tradeoff, their historical solution did not.

Naturally you don't have the power to bring old dresses into style. But that doesn't mean you can't use the historical solution today. By selecting the right clothing instead of flattening your curves, you can deter undesirable men while retaining all of your sex appeal when you undress. You don't need to make yourself plain to filter your suitors.

It's not possible to give instructions for finding the "right" style that are both precise and universally valid, because standards vary too much from place to place. Below I'll offer a few more general suggestions. But in the end you'll have to rely on your own judgment.

Some traditional, aristocratic dresses are quite low cut. Decolletage isn't fundamentally trashy. However, with today's less ornate styles a good starting guideline is to assume that the more cleavage you can show, the less you should show. Compensate with a proper fit that displays your silhouette, and avoid resorting to baggy clothes.

Similarly, if your rear is your most attractive trait, a good fit is a necessity. However, a short skirt isn't. Leggings are fairly common today for this very reason, yet they're hardly the only option. Well-fitted pants, pencil skirts, and dresses also work. And not only are they prettier, but they usually present you as more desirable for a relationship too.

To be clear, these are only suggestions. Appropriate fashion always depends on the context, and I can't know yours. If women around you have skin-tight pants, plunging necklines, or see-through tops, it may be best to compete in kind. Consider your personal goals and use your intelligence and sensitivity to position yourself effectively.

Wearing provocative clothes in private while dressing conservatively in public is a way to reduce tradeoffs with minimal effort.

Beyond the obvious tactic of showing more skin, provocative fashions that may increase sex appeal for a private or bacchanal setting include lace lingerie, pleated plaid “schoolgirl” miniskirts, chokers, and thigh-high stockings. Even in private, showing everything all the time is less exciting than concealing something that demands to be revealed.

While lingerie can indeed be a good idea, women tend to overestimate its value because it's so heavily marketed. Limiting yourself to lingerie when you're trying to look sexy at home is a mistake. There are plenty of other creative ways to show yourself off when you don't need to worry about public decorum. These extra-short skirts are just one example among many. Below are images of the same three glamour models in different outfits. It's easy to tone it down or turn it up to suit the context.

Because men like variety, periodically changing your style may make it easier to retain or reawaken your mate's attention. That includes both short-term variation between conservative and provocative clothing and occasional long-term shifts in your wardrobe. Note, however, that this has little to do with following current fashion trends.

Contrary to what most beauty magazines, sites, and influencers claim or imply, up-to-the-minute clothing styles aren’t important. The fashion industry makes money by persuading you that you’ll be more beautiful if you buy the newest clothes, but this simply isn’t true.

While it would be odd to go out in your grandmother’s dress, it doesn’t really matter whether you wear this year’s fashions or last year’s. So there's no need to waste time chasing fads.

Men are typically less enthusiastic about formal dresses and unusual fashions than women are. What matters most to them are the fundamentals. If you have a poor fashion sense or little interest, don't worry. Provided you follow the basic guidelines explained in this section, it's perfectly acceptable to wear "normal" clothes and leave it at that. Fit is more important than fashion.

Men's relative indifference to clothing choices that are interesting, rare, or novel is particularly evident in their color preferences. I've tabulated these below.

This chart overstates the value of black and blue due to their specific popularity in lingerie and jeans respectively. So it's more informative to break it down further.

It's tempting to guess after the cause of men's narrow tastes, but for our purposes here we'll just stick to the facts. Men find women more attractive when they're dressed in a standard palette consisting of white, black, red, and pink, as well as denim blue. Blue is good for jeans, but less good elsewhere.

Gray and floral patterns are also reasonably popular, and plaid is attractive in skirts. But men have less interest in the remaining colors. They find colors in the range of human flesh tones particularly unattractive. The more a color resembles your skin, the worse it is.

You might assume AI artists are just lazy about choosing clothes. But the distribution of colors is very far from random, and can't be an accident. A few men do prefer unusual colors, like the AI artist whose work is shown below. But it's a minority taste, not a common one.

To compare men's tastes to women's typical clothing choices, I counted the colors of over two hundred women in casual dress on a street corner in Gangnam and a boardwalk in Florida. Women in both places tend to wear too much beige, tan, gray, and blue, and not enough red and white. I also observed women passing through an airport terminal in Texas and saw even more egregious color failures there, with both olive green and gray markedly more common than pink, and blue tops worn far too often as well.

The few women who do wear red usually wear the wrong red, not the rich, ruby red men like most.

Today other beauty writers promote an elaborate system of color "seasons." Unfortunately their system isn't evidence based, and the advice it produces is dubious. For instance, the seasons system tells women with a "true autumn" complexion to wear browns, oranges, and related neutrals, but these are among the least attractive colors.

It's true that complexion, hair color, and eye color can influence which shades flatter you. But the inherent appeal of the most-loved clothing colors is independent from this influence. Ignoring that fact is a mistake.

Our observations point us toward a few simple guidelines with universal value. First and foremost, avoid flesh tones, or colors that are close to flesh tones. That includes beige, peach, tan, taupe, and brown. You should also avoid army greens, which are greens mixed with tan or brown. Olive is the most common example of a bad green. I call this collection of flesh and camo tones the unlucky palette.

Second, prioritize the standard palette of white, black, denim, pink, and red in your wardrobe. Red is too loud to wear all the time, but you should still consider wearing it more often than you probably do. You don't need to wear a red dress. Accents can help too.

Third, wear a color from the “variety” palette occasionally. This palette consists of dark blue, green, purple, gold, orange, turquoise, teal, and variations on these colors. Once every week or two is probably good.

The variety palette is less attractive than the standard palette. However, if you use it sparingly, it has the advantage of novelty. For example, if you wear black and white every day for two weeks and then wear violet, it will draw interest and seem exciting. Redheads benefit more from unusual colors, and should use them a little more often.

Fourth, black lingerie should be your default choice. Pink, white, and red are good too. But black is men's favorite.

The lingerie-color issue is worthy of special attention. Women often wear flesh-colored bras and panties because they don't show through clothing. But they're not attractive, and convenience doesn't change that fact. They virtually never occur in erotic imagery. In the hundreds of AI girls whose clothing I counted, the incidence of flesh-colored bras was actually zero.

If you're wearing an opaque top, you should never wear a flesh-colored bra under it. Even if your top is semi-transparent, take a moment to consider other options. For instance, a black bra showing through your top can be compelling.

White can be pleasant as well, and looks more modest. Pale pink is an attractive color that doesn't show through too badly, and often looks fine if it does. In contrast, when a flesh-colored bra becomes apparent under your top, the effect is underwhelming, and promises boredom.

A few more cautionary words about color before we move on. Bikini colors come in a wider palette than everyday clothes, so you might be tempted to wear neon. Neon does grab attention, but it can easily look trashy, and there's no evidence it's especially attractive.

Gray is a color men like well enough, but you should select the shade with care and avoid wearing it too often. Light gray in particular can make you look washed out and dull. Dark gray is overused today. Gray is also a poor choice for lingerie, though metallic silver isn't bad.

Let's sum up. Regardless of your complexion, it's best to focus your wardrobe on the standard palette of conventionally attractive colors. Especially so when you're in the mood to seduce. But neither the best artists nor the best glamour models strictly limit themselves to black and pink, and you shouldn't either. Wear variety colors occasionally to create interest. Just make sure to avoid overdoing gray, blue, and the unlucky palette of flesh and camo tones, which is especially bad for lingerie.

A final note before we move on to the next section. The two items women overrate the most are handbags and shoes. Handbags have nearly zero impact on attractiveness. While you should of course choose your shoes well and own pairs in different styles, variety isn't so important that you need to collect them in large numbers.

What type of shoes are best? Some men like bare feet, and particularly toes. So if you have nice feet it's sensible to choose footwear that makes them visible. Oddly enough, tall boots can also be attractive, probably because they direct the eye upward. They're especially worth wearing if you have nice legs. Heels are valuable not so much because the shoes themselves are appealing, but because they improve your posture and gait. This is a topic I'll return to later on.

3. Cosmetics and cosmetic surgery.

Cosmetic surgery is more common than you might assume. Once again, everyone lies. Women who’ve had work done normally deny it. Men are ignorant on the topic. They criticize artificiality, then ogle surgically-enhanced models. Men claim to care about “naturalness,” but in practice they’d rather see good results. Watch what people do, not what they say.

Most men prefer a breast size that’s rarely found in nature. In fact, it’s almost impossible to resemble some of the beauty examples in this article through natural means. One in twenty-five women now have implants, a number that’s increased steadily over time, and they’re especially common among glamour models who appeal to men. Today it's likely that the majority of slim women with large breasts have had surgical help.

Why are so many people convinced that cosmetic surgery doesn't work? The worst results are obvious, while the best don't appear surgical at all. Because they stand out the most, people mistakenly assume the worst results are typical. I call this the "gaudy graveyard" fallacy.

I won’t advise you for or against surgery. Weighing the risks is a personal matter. You should ask your surgeon to thoroughly explain the chance of complications so you can make an informed decision. Your health and happiness should come first, and it's up to you to decide how much effort this type of beautification is worth. But the truth is, it usually works.

Just how well does it work? The academic psychology study below might lead you to believe that breast augmentation is less effective at increasing your attractiveness than waxing, tooth whitening, ear piercing, nail painting, and even building your muscles. This is comically wrong. Simple ignorance is largely to blame for the confusion. But denialism plays a role as well. Our society's bizarre refusal to admit that breast size matters is accompanied by a matching refusal to admit just how much implants boost attractiveness.

While you'll rarely hear anyone say so in public, a good boob job is the single most powerful way for a slim woman to increase her sex appeal. The effect is so strong that we can be confident breast augmentation will eventually become the norm rather than the secret advantage for a small fraction of women it is today. The reason is simple. Men want big boobs, and a breast augmentation buys them. Painted nails aren't remotely comparable in importance, and weight loss becomes counterproductive when taken too far.

Well-executed breast augmentations are difficult to distinguish from the real thing. Many of the top search results for “best breasts” are augmented, and some have an openly artificial appearance. For comparison, these vintage centerfolds are excellent reference examples of the best natural breasts.

Men instinctively lie about beauty in general, and about cosmetic surgery in particular. They'll promise you they hate implants and get off to videos of women with implants on the same day. So to show how they really feel I had to resort to deception. I reversed the before and after photos of a breast augmentation and told them it was a reduction. Then I asked which they preferred.

Men chose the augmented breasts over the natural ones by a shocking ratio of more than thirty to one. Many described the big fakes as "perfect" and made demeaning comments about the flat photo. It's true that you can't trust polls to be accurate. But this result is stark and thought-provoking. It also fits our earlier finding that only 2-3% of men prefer a flat chest.

Articles about breast augmentation usually ignore the reality that male preferences extend far above the popular implant size of 350cc. Men's median breast size preference seems roughly equivalent to 800cc. And some men prefer twice that or more. This shouldn't come as a surprise. Women can be even more demanding and judgmental about size than men are.

Since rarity increases with size, it would be advantageous to exceed the median preference to meet the unsatisfied demand. But the rule that "bigger is better" only holds as long as you can maintain a good shape. 800cc is around the upper limit for reliably beautiful breast augmentations today, and even for professional glamour models it's hardly ever worth it to push that limit.

The effect of each implant size depends on your starting point as well as your overall body shape, but here you can see common surgical outcomes compared to examples from this article. Contrary to what most people assume, small implants aren’t more convincing than large ones. However, extreme, oversized implants have a distorted shape and should be avoided.

In some parts of the world obvious plastic surgery has become a status symbol. But whenever status signaling interferes with feminine beauty, the result is less feminine beauty. It doesn't matter if it's excessively low bodyfat or flagrantly fake implants.

This article promotes a naturalistic or too-good-to-be-true look, not an overdone look. Cosmetic surgery shouldn't announce itself as such. While a few men do fetishize the appearance of excessive surgery and blatantly fake breasts, a much larger number find it distasteful. The difference lies not in the size itself, as women tend to assume, but in the quality of the shape.

For a guide to shape, refer to this image. The top row shows photos selected by men as examples of perfect shape. Note that some (or all) of these are augmented. The bottom row shows the shape of breasts on sex dolls. The third sex doll has a combination of size and shape that's impossible in reality.

This survey compares the popularity of various shapes and sizes. An experienced surgeon has estimated the winner at the upper left to be approximately 1000ccs. The fraction of men who didn't find it attractive was almost insignificant.

As you can see, men prefer a little sag. A high and spherical look isn't a sign of perfection, it's the hallmark of a poor boob job. Upward-pointing nipples are thought to be advantageous, and can be found on some, but not all, of men's favorite breasts.

Breast augmentations have gotten better and more consistent over time, but even today there's a chance of botched or mediocre work. Not all surgeons are good at what they do, so it's important to research thoroughly before you commit.

First study all the linked images in this section so you know what ideal breasts should look like. The videos shown in the later section on motion are also good reference points. Then ask for clear photos of each surgeon's previous patients and compare their results to the examples I've provided. Talk to patients about their experience if you can. Don't choose a surgeon at random and hope for luck, or you might be sorely disappointed.

If your goal is to be as attractive as possible without undue risk, I recommend you request the largest size that can be achieved safely in a single surgery. For the average woman this is around 600cc, but it varies from 500cc to 800cc depending on the width of your chest. It's a size that looks impressive without sacrificing shape.

You might be tempted to select smaller implants because you're afraid of excessive attention from men or retaliation from jealous friends. When choosing a size you should consider your personal comfort level, just as you do when choosing clothes. But keep in mind that 300cc implants entail nearly the same costs and risks as 600cc implants, while providing only half the benefits.

This difference isn't just about raw size. Large implants will give you access to the full range of attractive motions, while small implants will not. The significance of this will become clear in a later section.

As far as beauty is concerned, augmentations below 500cc are a missed opportunity. Conservative tops will allow you to tone your chest down as needed, but an underwhelming boob job will always be underwhelming when it matters most.

Narrow hips aren't a good reason to limit yourself to small implants, because the effects of breasts and butts are mainly independent and additive. In other words, 1+1 > 1+0 > 0+0. "Balance" might sound respectable in conversation, but it has relatively little effect on your attractiveness in itself.

Don't rely on cup letters when selecting your size. Cup letters can be misleading, and the bra sizes cited by surgeons are often smaller than those buxom women report to fit comfortably.

It's also important not to fixate on numbers in isolation. 800cc implants usually create a slightly but noticeably unnatural shape on a woman with an average frame, because they're a little more than she can comfortably fit. But on a tall woman with a wide chest, they may not even look big at all. For instance, the model on the left below actually has larger implants than the model on the right.

Rice sizers help to visualize how larger breasts will look on your body. You can find instructions for making them online. Just keep adding rice until you resemble different images in this article, and see how you feel. However, rice sizers are less useful for their nominal purpose of sizing. Because they sit differently than implants, they can misrepresent sizes by as much as 150ccs. Usually they look bigger than implants, but this isn't a hard rule. So don't choose your final implant size on the basis of rice-sizer volume.

The next two examples illustrate the full range of well-shaped breast-augmentation results. The model at left has small implants, probably around 300cc. The model at right is a good representation of the maximum effect, which most women shouldn't expect to match.

A common question is whether you can augment your breasts with fat transfer instead of implants. Fat transfer can only move small amounts of tissue at once, which means it would require many surgeries over a long period of time to achieve a significant increase in volume. So fat transfer isn't a practical alternative to implants. It can, however, be used in addition to implants for a small boost that may increase naturalness.

It's a good idea to reevaluate your wardrobe after your augmentation. When you have large breasts, it's important to wear properly fitted tops, not shapeless ones. You may also want to consider higher necklines.

To be clear, the breast sizes I've recommended above only apply to implant selection. If you're naturally bigger, that's not a weakness in need of surgical correction.

In the gallery below you'll find photos of a breast reduction. Even starting from an exceptional size well above the median preference, men did not consider it an improvement. While several confounding factors may have biased this poll, none are as important as the supply-demand advantage that greatly favors her pre-op appearance. It was so rare that a 1% share of men's vote would already have been enough to make it valuable, let alone 58%. All things considered, we can be confident that reducing her breasts also reduced her attractiveness by a considerable margin.

Because large breasts are more popular than large rears in most of the world, butt augmentation will provide a lower return on investment than breast augmentation for the majority of readers. If you're not a professional model, financially well-off, or seeking to please men who prioritize butts, it's questionable whether the benefit will justify the expense.

If you do decide to get a butt lift, the gallery of AI girls in different sizes shown below is a useful reference for shape. The lower row exhibits the same salient traits men selected when I asked them to identify the best large butt shape in glamour models.

While men prefer breasts with some natural sag over spherical breasts, unusually round and prominent buttocks with minimal sag have high erotic value at all sizes. You can see an especially clear illustration of this below.

The most-prized buttocks are large and have the curve of an egg laid on its side, with a pronounced backward projection. Imaginary women sometimes display these characteristics to an extravagant degree, and glamour models use cosmetic surgery to cultivate a similar look.

I cite these last examples to illustrate the full range of male tastes without advising you to imitate them. Butt surgery is more dangerous than other types of plastic surgery. Although the results are usually good, I don't encourage you to take unnecessary risks.

Hip augmentation can meaningfully improve your hourglass figure, but normally won't be worth the cost to women with a modest budget. Because it's currently uncommon, I'm not going to cover it in this section. However, if you're wealthy, intend to be a model, or have especially narrow hips, it's worthy of consideration.

Excessive lip fillers are sometimes intentionally used by glamour models because they pop well on Instagram. The same can be said for false eyelashes, which sometimes look good in photos when they're implausibly large. In real life, lip fillers are best in moderation. You can see an example of lips that are plump but not excessive here.

Not everyone should get a nose job, but in some cases it makes an enormous difference. The actress shown a moment ago had a nose job as well as a breast augmentation. Fixating on your nose can make it seem larger than it is, so don't obsess and have it reduced excessively.

As we discussed earlier, the best faces aren't just distinguished by a few obvious traits like noses, but by a large number of small, interacting advantages that collectively add up to a more attractive whole. The sheer number of relevant dimensions is overwhelming. And the kind of rough estimates that work perfectly well for breast augmentation simply can't deal with this level of complexity and subtlety.

One approach is to rely on an experienced cosmetic surgeon's professional opinion. Unfortunately it's not always easy to know which surgeon you can trust to tweak the finer details of your face. Some surgeons are talented artists, and some are not. Variation in salesmanship may make it difficult to distinguish one from the other in advance. Today, however, women who wish to optimize their faces can also begin by consulting AI.

Although novel at the time of writing, the method I propose is simple. Use a beautifying face filter to visually transform your face into a more attractive version of itself. Then do what's necessary to make your face look like that better version of you. A face filter may provide useful ideas for cosmetic contouring or fillers that require minimal risk and expense, and useful ideas for surgical intervention as well.

Some changes you see in the filter may be impossible to achieve in reality, but others will be doable or even easy. Ask your surgeon to create a representation of the expected end result to make sure you're satisfied before you move ahead. Don't take any risks you're not comfortable with, and when in doubt, be satisfied with stopping at the most certain improvements.

It's important to highlight potential issues. Beautification filters aren't perfected at the time of writing, so this recommendation is a little premature. Don't assume they provide correct information about every face. The face below was generated by an AI with the prompt "pretty woman," but it's not a good face. You should never blindly trust AI. Always use your own judgment, taking the examples in this article as a reference point.

While quality and accuracy should improve over time, all existing filters have a more fundamental flaw. They’re not designed to account for supply and demand.

By consequence, filters promote generic faces that are pleasing to the majority rather than unique faces that are especially exciting to a minority. This won’t change until professionals design better software. In the meantime, you'll have to decide for yourself whether the face filter is guiding you in a direction that will make a positive impact on your life.

This article may be dedicated to refuting beauty lies. However, at present there's still a social stigma surrounding cosmetic procedures in some parts of the world. So if you live in one of these regions and opt for surgery, it may be prudent to lie about it. You can shift the blame for this little crime to the author. I don't mind.

Today some petty women will announce that anyone with nice curves "looks plastic," even when the claim is false, and even when no surgery was involved (here are three "obvious and very fake-looking BBLs"). In other words, they group natural curves and well-done surgery together with an ugly, overdone look to be demeaning.

In the majority of cases this is just jealousy speaking. They can't measure up, so they try to pull their competition down. Instead of taking it to heart, remind yourself that they're insulting you because they feel sexually inferior and have low moral standards. It's an ugly thing to say, but it's true, and their behavior doesn't merit minced words.

In the future improved medical techniques will surely replace the current ones. For instance, breast implants will eventually be replaced by noninvasive hormonal or gene therapy derived from studies of macromastia. However, where your body is concerned, innovations need to be treated with caution. Their long-term effects may be unknown. If you choose to use new or recently developed cosmetic technologies, please do your research first.

The guidelines provided in this section are intended for average women with a middle-class budget. I've highlighted the procedures that provide the biggest boost to attractiveness with the least effort and risk. But today’s professional glamour models take advantage of a wider array of procedures that are impractical for the average woman. Typically they won’t admit this in public. You shouldn’t assume you can afford to duplicate their results. And trying to do too much increases the risk something will go wrong. When in doubt, it's wise to use moderation.

Some women are strangely offended by the assertion that plastic surgery works. They shouldn't be. It means you have the power to change your body if and when you want to. Whatever you decide, the option is liberating.

You might be surprised, but studies actually show that cosmetic surgery provides lasting increases to happiness. The biggest gains come from breast surgery. However, studies can be wrong, so if you’re considering a procedure, talk first to trustworthy women who have gone through with it. Ask them if they’re glad they did, and ask your doctor to explain the risks. Men tend to give dishonest or uninformed answers, so in most cases you’re better off not listening to them.

Men’s ignorance about makeup is similar to their ignorance about surgery. Don’t be misled. Those who claim to prefer women without makeup actually prefer “natural-looking” makeup, but don’t realize it. The reality is that all women look better in makeup. Men's beauty advice is sometimes hard to distinguish from sabotage.

Fortunately you can get most of the benefits with a simple and efficient routine that doesn’t require hours every day. Makeup techniques are best learned from instructional videos, so I won't go into any detail here.

Heavy Instagram-style makeup is meant to be effective when viewed on a small phone screen. To avoid looking clownish, make sure to tone it down for real life. The example below is wearing a little too much eyeshadow.

Just because a style is trending doesn't mean it's smart. To avoid fashionable makeup mistakes, study AI-girl faces.

It's surprisingly common for women to do their eyebrows wrong. It's not necessary for everyone to cultivate an arch or a sharp point, and trying to force your eyebrows into a shape that doesn't suit your face leads to poor results. The important thing is to make sure they look dense and well defined. Don't make them into a thin line on purpose. The eyebrows shown at the left below are a mistake, and almost never seen in AI-girl faces.

A beauty mistake often seen in fashion advertising is using cosmetic contouring and even buccal fat removal to create or enhance the appearance of hollow cheeks. Don't do it. Like much of high fashion, this has a masculinizing effect worsened by excessively low bodyfat. Tastes do vary, especially where faces are concerned. But most men prefer full cheeks. You can confirm this by reexamining the images in the faces section. In fact, a procedure to increase cheek fullness should make older faces look more youthful, and perhaps significantly so. The fact that many are doing the reverse instead is a sad illustration of just how disconnected fashions are from genuine beauty.

Nails aren't very important, and certainly less important than women assume. Popular images of imaginary women hardly ever feature nails prominently, and long nails are especially rare. Painted nails do occur often enough, but natural nails and pastels are more common than intense colors. There aren't necessarily any rules where nails are concerned. But the safest default is to choose medium to short nails in a subtle color or clear polish. The evidence doesn't support the widespread view that long nails are the most attractive, nor even that painting is a must.

4. Hair, skin, and eyes.

The chart below shows the distribution of different hair colors at a major sex doll retailer.

Blonde and red hair are both overrepresented compared to their frequency in the general population, and blondes who would naturally have black hair are especially overrepresented among imaginary women of all kinds. So if you intend to dye your hair, you should consider these colors first.

Strange colors like purple, blue, and green are common in artistic representations of women, and sometimes shown in this article for that reason. Pink is the most popular of these, and in AI girls it occurs more often than red hair. But outside an artistic context, men today express a strong preference for naturally occurring colors. This may be merely a matter of fashion. Nevertheless, for the time being I recommend you avoid unusual shades.

While blonde and red hair do tend to have an advantage in general terms, the best hair color for you will ultimately depend on your face and complexion. The famous faces most frequently submitted to my faces survey are actually framed by dark hair.

Hair length is far more important to men than hair color. Not a single beauty example above has short hair! This isn’t an accident. Almost all men dislike short hair. It was nearly absent from their submissions to my favorite faces study.

Below you can see the thirty standard hairstyle options one sex doll manufacturer offers with their full-body dolls. Styles descending below the breasts occur the most frequently. Most women can increase their attractiveness by wearing their hair longer. You may even want to consider growing it out to waist length.

Of course, there's some individual variability. A bob can look good on the right person. But it’s a mistake to cut your hair shorter. There are hardly any exceptions to this rule. If you've been considering a short hairstyle, please stop.

Today the removal of body hair is widely considered a basic, unquestionable necessity for feminine beauty. Imaginary women support this view. They never have hairy legs, and very rarely have underarm hair. Shaving recreates a smooth, prepubescent appearance men seem to find attractive.

However, the case for removing underarm hair isn't as absolute as many believe. Pubic hair even less so. Not only has there been considerable historical variation in shaving expectations, but there's also clear evidence that even today at least a few men prefer unshaven underarms. Consider, for instance, the AI artist whose work is shown below. You should always avoid stubble and hairy legs, which aren't attractive to anyone. And removing underarm hair is, to be clear, the safe and advisable default. But leaving it unshaven isn't out of the question, at least in places where it's customary.

Classic paintings almost never depict beautiful women with a tan. Women once wore broad-brimmed hats and carried parasols to avoid them. Reader selections for best breast and butt shape are either untanned or lightly tanned, and AI girls and popular anime girls normally have no tan at all.

Below you'll find a composite image of skin patches from over a hundred randomly selected AI girls that were posted to the #aigirl hashtag on social media. All patches were clipped from the center of the chest, the typical focal point of AI-girl images, which provides the clearest and most consistent representation of coloration. The many patches with a grayish tint are dimly lit, not tanned. You can see at a glance that untanned skin is far more common than tanned skin. In fact, fewer than ten percent of the images are distinctly tanned.

The generic sex-doll torsos discussed earlier also have untanned or lightly tanned skin.

However, tanned and untanned skin occur with more equal frequency among the broader range of sex dolls, and uncensored search results display a range of skin tones nearly as diverse as those shown in this article.

The data is thus mixed, with the evidence against tanning stronger than the evidence in its favor. Tanned skin appears to serve as a fashionable signal whose intrinsic effect on feminine beauty is neutral at best, and likely negative. At the very least, its value is overestimated by women today.

You can decide whether and how much to tan based on local conditions and fashions, as well as your personal style. But despite its popularity, there's no basis to recommend sunbathing for aesthetic purposes.

Since excessive sun exposure accelerates aging and tanning is unlikely to have a significant positive effect on your appearance, the default choice should be to avoid exposing your skin to more sun than is necessary for good health. Heavy tan lines from sunbathing in bikinis have an especially unfortunate effect, and are best avoided.

If you're very pale and have no tan at all, don't let anyone tell you it makes your skin looks plain and sickly. This view is not supported by contemporary evidence, and it's strongly contradicted by historical representations of beauty.

Because people generally perceive brighter colors as prettier than brown, it's natural to assume blue and green eyes are more attractive than brown eyes. However, the data doesn't clearly support this view.

Individual men do sometimes prefer a particular eye color. Yet the frequency of eye colors in sex dolls matches the frequency of eye colors in the population, implying it's a neutral trait on the group level. Academic studies also indicate that colorful eyes provide no advantage. Well-publicized research claiming otherwise is sponsored by companies that sell colored contact lenses, and of dubious quality.

It still seems logical that brighter colors would be more attractive. But the advantage is likely small, and overwhelmed by other factors. There's thus no particular need to change your eye color with contact lenses. Nor is there any harm in doing so if it suits your mood.

Nevertheless, certain eye colors combine well with certain cosmetic, clothing, and hair colors to create a pleasant overall effect, and this does tend to work better with light eyes. For instance, a green scarf will bring out green eyes. So if you have light-colored eyes, take advantage of them.

5. Motion and posture.

An attractive woman is more attractive when moving. Some otherwise beautiful women remain very stiff and still. This is a mistake that makes them less appealing. The effect of movement is so strong that many readers will consider the images in this section pornographic, even though they're clothed and no more revealing than those seen earlier in the article. It's impossible to cover the topic properly without such images, which is why no one else does. To provide you with the most useful and accurate information on feminine beauty, I'll go where others fear to tread. If you think they might bother you, please skip to the next section now.

A few women have an excellent intuition for attractive motions. They'll find it ridiculous to hear them spelled out in instructions. But the reality is that the majority of women need to learn. Prudish conventional beauty advice fails to explain thoroughly. Men typically aren't aware either, because a good performance creates the illusion of natural spontaneity. They don't spend time to consider that the girls they see on the internet have been coached and rehearsed. And there's nothing wrong with rehearsing. With a little practice, you can create the same illusion.

A small sway as you walk can have a powerful effect on men, especially if your posture is good. A bounce can show off your chest or rear. You don't need extravagant curves for this. Modest curves are enough. The examples above and below demonstrate how you can incorporate these into your gait. And this example shows that you can apply the same basic bounce and sway technique with subtlety and casualness.

High heels encourage a swaying gait, so to look your best you should wear them whenever you can. Some advise a minimum of three inches, but even two will have a beneficial effect.

I recommend you always walk with a feminine gait. This will support the illusion that it's natural and unstudied. If anyone remarks on it, you should steadfastly maintain that it's "just the way I walk."

However, you need to match the amount of sway and bounce to the occasion. The gaits shown immediately before and after this paragraph can stop traffic, especially when you're dressed to show them off. So much bounce is overkill in most public places, and best reserved for short bursts only. It's important to use moderation in daily life to ensure you attract the right kind of attention.

What counts as moderation depends in large part on the customs where you live. The minimum dose is the safest, and there's nothing wrong with conservative poise and elegance. In a dance club or behind closed doors, on the other hand, you can be more liberal.

Whether you're walking, standing, or kneeling, the most basic type of attractive motion is a shake or bounce that shows off your curves by causing them to change direction on a slight lag to the rest of your body. This can be done subtly, as in the left image below, or overtly, as in the right image. It goes without saying that the latter is best reserved for private use, but the concept is exactly the same.

The twerking movement being rehearsed in slow motion at the center below is now practiced by large groups in gyms or dance studios. The example shown here is fine. But caution is in order. Despite its popularity, this mass of asses moving with an athletic and almost masculine forcefulness seems grotesque to some men. The left and right images demonstrate that violent movements aren't necessary to be seductive.

Men's critical remarks about strippers and the like may discourage you from trying to copy these examples. But don't take this disdain the wrong way. Context is often what makes the difference between trashy and sexy.

You shouldn't be afraid to use the movements shown here in private. The fraction of men who will react badly is quite small, while the fraction of men who want to see them but feel awkward about asking is much larger. If you cede them to paid entertainers you'll only give the latter more power over men than they deserve. That's not morally pure. In fact, it hurts all of us. So don't be trapped by a misguided sense of shame. In the proper context it's morally righteous to be as sexy as possible.

The main thing good examples have in common is an impression of ease and fluidity. However, even timid motions can be more attractive than stillness, and they sometimes have a charming naivete, as in the right and left images above. A lighthearted mood and sense of fun will help to excuse any initial clumsiness.

What you should avoid above all is giving the impression that your movements are an unpleasant obligation that doesn't flow from self-expression. Every woman pictured here visibly enjoys putting on a show, including the awkward one wearing lavender shorts in the previous gallery and the demure girl seen earlier biting her sweater. This is quite important.

If you're flat and thin with narrow hips, displays of elegance or youthful agility may prove more effective than the type of movement shown above. These are harder to execute and difficult to characterize in writing. Note that runway models aren't reliable exemplars for imitation, because their gaits are sometimes rather aggressive. This is intended to impress you with their confidence so you buy their clothes, not to look good to men.

This is only a small selection from the wide variety of possible movements. It's intended to be a reliable starting point, not a comprehensive encyclopedia. It consists of time-tested images that have ranked near the top of internet search results for years or even decades, and are thus likely to have the broadest and most enduring appeal to men. Nevertheless, better examples can be found elsewhere.

I recommend you seek out popular, high-quality videos of attractive women with a similar body type and study the way they move in different contexts. Solo videos like the examples below will be especially instructive. Pay attention to those with a style and mood you like. Then adapt their movements to work for you. Don't try to put together a dance routine. Simple is best, and many videos may be too involved. You'll have to do some experimentation to learn what works in real life.

You'll make the fastest progress by first practicing in a mirror or on video. Start by imitating your favorite from the images here, and repeat until your own video matches the model. When it does, you'll be confident you're looking good. You can learn each motion in just minutes, or a few hours at most. One day's study will benefit you for an entire lifetime. That's a better return for your time than any other beauty technique.

If you have a lover you feel comfortable with, you can present the search for his favorite motion as a humorous game where you playfully demonstrate various alternatives. For instance, start with one of the simplest motions and ask him if he likes it. Then perform it a little differently and ask if it's better or worse. Then repeat the process with a new motion. This kind of game will greatly speed up improvements to your technique. Naturally it should also be a fun experience on its own. Don't expect every motion to be a hit though. Over time you'll find the limited collection of motions that best matches your body type and his taste, and learn how to perform them perfectly.

If you're too shy to use any of these motions yet, try gradually introducing sway into your gait as described earlier. Increase it a little each week from an almost imperceptible starting point so no one notices the change. This should help to break the ice. Then you can move on to using subtle movements like this one.

Facial expressions, and especially expressive eye motions, can also make a valuable contribution. So do remember to pay attention to the eyes when you watch example videos. When possible you should usually look your partner in the eye while you perform these movements, without, of course, expecting him to maintain eye contact in return.

The "killshot" expression, discussed in the section on faces, has special power. It combines three seemingly contradictory elements: fear, pleasure, and painful longing. Practice in a mirror until you can make the composite expression without any sign of artificiality. Obviously you shouldn't use it at random. You'll need to wait for, or create, an appropriate circumstance.

Expressions that feature a slightly open mouth are usually more attractive than those where the mouth remains closed. Lip biting can also have an erotic effect.

Stern, confidently assertive expressions are more attractive on men than on women. For instance, the expression below doesn't project confidence, but rather hopefulness with an underlying uncertainty that makes it feminine and extremely attractive.

In fact, unconfident, fearful, and even outright embarrassed expressions can be attractive on women, especially when they're spiked with an undercurrent of anticipatory desire. Surprisingly, the expression doesn't need to look genuine. It will still have an erotic impact if it looks put-on and playful.

Below an artist explains how he prompted AI to sex up a popular cartoon character. The left image is before he finished the edits he describes, the right is after. The fact that displaying emotions associated with weakness can increase your feminine power, whereas displaying emotions associated with strength can reduce your feminine power, is an interesting paradox of human nature.

Although they're not strictly necessary, expressions and eye contact enhance fellatio, which naturally pulls attention toward your face. One approach is to make your face the stage for a drama where lust is held back by the other emotions I've just mentioned (bashfulness, hopeful uncertainty, fear, embarrassment, and so on), but eventually overcomes them. I'll explain why this works on men in the next section.

If you have a particularly youthful face you can win hearts by making a show of cute and girlish mannerisms. This will fall flat unless you're the appropriate type, so evaluate yourself honestly before you try it. Neoteny is one of the most important aspects of beauty, but it's also the least durable. In contrast, the bodily motions shown in this section are still effective for fit middle-aged women.

It's true that sophisticated traditional dances are more beautiful and more impressive than any of the movements shown in this article. But while they require more skill, they don't achieve better results in today's environment. People may be impressed by ballroom dancing, but being impressed and actually caring are not the same thing.

Because there's so little hard data on motion preferences, I asked men to rate all the images in this section. You can see the results in the galleries below, presented in order of popularity. Men aren't good at separating motions from models, so one should always assume they're rating both. Recall that I intentionally chose dated gifs for these examples because they provide evidence of enduring appeal. Newer videos would receive higher scores.

These results require an important caveat beyond the usual warning about surveys. The votes show which images are popular, not which are best. Some popular motions may not work for your body type. Moreover, your lover may be most aroused by unpopular motions. That's why experimentation is indispensable. You should also vary the motions you use to avoid inducing boredom. Don't stop at learning just one or two easy motions. Novelty is an aphrodisiac for men.

The raw popularity scores are especially misleading where rear motions are concerned, due to the divided opinions I explained a moment ago. When a third of men rate a big butt motion "very attractive," that's actually a good score, because it implies that all the men who like big butts like the motion.

You might still worry that if you use sexy motions your lover will think less of you. So I specifically asked men whether they'd find them attractive or off-putting coming from their girlfriend. When shown an example from this section, a stunning 99% of men said they wished their girlfriend would use attractive motions in the bedroom. Not all men like the same motions, but all men do enjoy motions of some kind. It's only a matter of figuring out which ones your lover prefers.

The wide appeal of a feminine gait is worth highlighting again. Nearly everyone likes it, you have fine control over the degree of emphasis, and you can even use it in public, making it one of the best tools at your disposal.

The motion at center below is also worthy of special mention. Apart from a basic gait, this was the highest-rated motion that’s effective for any body type. It received a warm welcome from men even though the model has hardly any curves on display. While it's not guaranteed to work on every man, I still recommend every woman learn to imitate it exactly.

Before moving on to the next section I'll take a moment to address posture. Common sense already dictates that you should follow the normal rules of good posture. Hunching your shoulders inward is a widespread error you should take care to avoid.

Due to desk jobs and excessive screen time, poor posture is more common today than ever before. You can find stretches and exercises that claim to help, but most of these aren't sufficient to compensate for hours a day spent hunched over your phone. If you struggle with posture, I recommend you try rucking (walking with a weighted backpack) several times a week. This strengthens the muscles needed for good posture and encourages better habits.

The less familiar posture shown below is also an important one to learn.

Men prefer to see the rear curled outward and upward, with a concave curve in the lower back, and as a rule erotic drawings and photos present it that way even if no sexual activity is implied, regardless of whether the figure is sitting or standing. Look again at the earlier examples and you'll see it repeated over and over, whenever the perspective is from behind.

Consider the postures in the diagram above. The posterior tilt at center is the worst. The "good" right posture is unexciting, albeit not ugly. The "unhealthy" anterior tilt at left is the most attractive, and matches the posture commonly seen in representations of imaginary women. High heels encourage this position, which is yet another reason to wear them. Perhaps, however, not while lifting weights.

The same principle holds in a bent position. It's more attractive to curl your rear out and pull your lower back inward than to do the reverse. This posture can become rather lewd when it's exaggerated, so as usual, you'll have to be sensitive to the context.

The above example is rather obvious. Below you can see a subtler error that's very common. The posture on the right is much more attractive than the posture on the left, and indispensable in the bedroom. So practice until you do it correctly without thinking about it.

Movement and posture can give you a real advantage over stiff women who look prettier than you in a photo. Not to mention sex dolls. They're free, easy to learn, and offer substantial benefits to women of all types. So don't just lie back and think of England. Put your beauty in motion.

As I'll explain in the next section, it's especially attractive to move and pose on your own initiative, without waiting for your partner to prompt you. This applies to subtle and frank motions alike.

6. The most common misconception about seduction.

A course in seduction would be beyond the scope of this article, but one simple point is worthy of mention.

A common myth is that women are most attractive when they're passive and submissive. This is not the case. While always being forward is too masculine and submissiveness is often desirable, consistent passivity is unexciting. It raises no questions and elicits no interest. To be seductive you should mix forwardness and passivity in the correct proportions. This is not a matter of taking a masculine role, because feminine forwardness is different from masculine dominance. Naturally, you can't duplicate seduction techniques men would use on you and expect them to work in reverse.

I'll draw your attention to some familiar evidence. The most common titillation scene in movies and television aimed at men is simply an attractive woman undressing without being asked. In fact, it's much more common than a man undressing her or asking her to undress, let alone forcing her to do so. This is not an accident. Men don't find passive submission optimally attractive, and they prefer enthusiastic partners over unwilling ones.

Academic research on fantasies, pornography statistics, and an analysis of popular fiction all support the idea that violence and power dynamics aren't important erotic triggers for the majority of men. In fact, most men are reluctant to even request all the things they'd enjoy, let alone try to compel you. This isn't because they're weak or lack confidence. By waiting for you to act on your own initiative, they can see a clearer signal of your affection. Much like women, men want to be wanted. And for good reason. A partner who wants you is always more reliable, and therefore more valuable, than a partner who doesn't. This remains true no matter how strong and powerful you are.

If you reexamine the erotic imagery in the previous section, you'll notice women are always presented as warm and inviting and in a state of arousal or pleasure, never cold, hostile, resistant, or indifferent. Acting cold and hostile and waiting for men to conquer you is rarely an effective approach in reality, and the longer a relationship lasts, the more counterproductive it becomes. Evincing a low sex drive reduces your sex appeal too, and to an even greater extent. Indeed, sourness and sexual frigidity are the two most repellent traits. They tell men something's wrong with you psychologically or hormonally.

Enthusiasm is inherently more attractive than reticence. So much so that men fantasize about women who are unrealistically enthusiastic. However, this doesn't mean immediately giving men everything they want is a good idea. Part of seduction is about being elusive, and it's harmful to be too easy too soon. People don't value things they obtain too readily. After you've created interest, allow it time to grow in his mind. A little hunger is the best spice.

Consider the stereotypical seductress, often a villain. She will flirt, then play hard to get, disappear, and then suddenly appear and drop her clothes, and the male will find her unexpected forwardness irresistible. In contrast, the slut will throw herself at anyone without hesitation, and the boring girl will quietly do nothing.

These stereotypes have a lesson to teach us. By adopting a flirtatious and coy attitude, using subtle motions to draw attention to your body, and punctuating passivity and elusiveness with frank sexual displays, you can use your beauty to maximum effect. The right combination of push and pull will both confuse and excite men.

The correct approach to seduction changes over time. In the early stages it's best to tempt him subtly and then wait for him to pursue. But contrary to what you may have heard, frank sexual advances initiated by women are highly beneficial in the context of an established relationship, and can completely change men's attitude toward you. You'll be the hot girlfriend instead of the cute but boring one. And that makes your relationship more likely to endure.

In fact, seduction is more important when you're in a relationship than when you're looking for one, and the longer a relationship lasts, the more sexually forward you should be. Sadly, most women fail to understand this and instead allow their lover's interest to wane over time.

If you're hesitant to take the initiative in one way or another, perhaps the polls below will persuade you. A huge majority of men say they want their lover to be sexually forward in a relationship. They just can't tell her.

Your lover may confirm the suggestions given here if you ask him. But I recommend you don't. Good communication is normally important. However, when it comes to demonstrating enthusiasm, a premeditated or businesslike attitude would dampen the effect. Indeed, it's probably best to keep this entire article a secret. If you've long been passive in an established relationship, you can justify the change by first complaining about an unusually strong hormonal cycle. Buy some chocolate, leave it on the counter, and then act emotional about something unimportant. Afterwards your behavior will seem spontaneous and natural.

Since seduction scenes in movies always take place at night, most women assume that's the right time to initiate sex. But few men feel their best after a long work day. Another widespread myth is that men are always in the mood. This just isn't true, at least past their teenage years. So if he doesn't respond when you want him to, don't be offended. Midmorning on Sunday and Saturday may actually be the most impactful time to draw interest. Approaching your lover in the early morning, perhaps before he's awake, is worth a try too.

Feminine means of initiation fall into two basic categories: visual display and direct touch. A simple way to begin is to partly undress. While motion isn't required, it's especially compelling to accompany this undressing with movements suitable for your body type, gradually building up into a brief tease. If you've never done this before, draw his attention and then start with something simple, like a slow drop reveal.

When initiating through direct touch you should usually move gently with the intent to give pleasure. Brusque and assertive touch is useful as an occasional spice, but it's more masculine and less reliably seductive.

Although playing hard to get isn't good idea in an established relationship, you can still build anticipation through other means. For instance, titillate him when time or circumstances don't allow for escalation, and then resume later. Or incorporate subtly attractive motions into your daily routine around the house. And when you're at home, always wear attractive clothing. It doesn't make sense to save your pretty clothes for the outside world and dress in ugly things when you're alone with your lover, but this is exactly what most women do.

Don't be cold toward your lover because you're afraid of seeming slutty. It's true that men value promiscuous women less, and that being too forward with strangers will invite distrust. And it's true that men prefer a woman with a low body count for a serious relationship. But what men want in the long run is faithfulness and exclusivity, not coldness or indifference. These are not the same. In fact, if you're too cold they're more likely to stray to women who apply the ideas just presented. Don't wait for them to tell you so, because it's unlikely they ever will. And remember that it's morally good to be sexy.

You don't need to be confident to seduce. In fact, bashfulness and timidity can be seductive. That doesn't contradict the advice already given, because shyness and forwardness aren't actually opposites, just as lustfulness and chastity aren't actually opposites. For instance, these AI girls' expressions and poses are timid and provocative at the same time.

The most consistently good results come from coyness. That is, affecting or simulating shyness in a flirtatious way.

The apparent contradictions are easily explained. A man finds a woman especially desirable when she exhibits both bashfulness (implying youth, femininity, and low promiscuity), and also a desire for him that's strong enough to overcome this bashfulness (implying vitality, love, and faithfulness). It's obvious why these characteristics would make for a good mate.

Nevertheless, there's more than one way to be seductive. Confidence can still work, provided you don't allow it to undermine your femininity. Mixing coyness with your confidence can help you avoid an unpleasant masculine edge.

The observations I've made about activity and passivity in seduction also apply to sex itself. While it's normal for men to lead, lying motionlessly like a dead fish will reduce your appeal. When you think of sex as a dance similar to tango or ballet this should be obvious. If the female dancer were just a limp object in the male's arms, the dance would be boring. And yet most women make exactly this mistake, effectively reducing themselves to mannequins. Instead you should intersperse encouraging visual displays, and take the active role now and then. The right dose and timing is something you'll have to learn with experience.

You may be troubled to know that a large majority of men have fantasies involving multiple partners. Yet it's possible to simulate variety and multiplicity by making significant changes to your clothing, makeup, and hair. You can do this every couple of years, or for special occasions. Gradual, minor alterations will have little effect, because the purpose is to look like a “new” woman. Men's taste for variety is strong enough that even cutting your hair short, one of the worst beauty mistakes you can make, will briefly increase your lover's interest. Fortunately there are innumerable better ways to vary your style that can make seduction easier in a lasting relationship.

The purpose of all the maneuvers I've listed in this section doesn't lie only in the pleasure you might give your lover in brief moments here and there. Rather, by eliciting desire and giving pleasure in the most impactful ways, you create for yourself an erotic aura that transcends any individual moment and positively colors your lover's overall perception of your character. And this in turn increases your feeling of desirability, enhancing your own enjoyment.

Seduction is a complex topic that merits an article of its own, which will, alas, never be written. For lack of time I've described it in broad strokes using many rough generalizations, and it's up to you to work out the specifics. Not all men have the same tastes. For instance, a small minority of men enjoy being dominated by women, and will respond well to aggressive assertiveness that other men only appreciate as occasional variety. Experiment, then judge your success by his reactions. As with attractive motions, the unavoidable short-term risk of embarrassment or awkwardness is more than justified by the long-term benefits you'll enjoy after you get it right.

7. Personality and individuality.

As far as beauty is concerned, your personality doesn't matter very much. This article isn't a complete guide to life or relationships, so if you want to read about personality in a larger context you should look elsewhere. However, you might first ask yourself whether beautiful girls with bland personalities, or even terrible character, really struggle to catch the mates they want.

In the previous section we saw that some character traits can influence seductiveness. But these seductive traits have little to do with individuality or moral quality. And without the raw power of visual beauty behind them, they'd have no effect. The vast majority of us prefer a physically attractive lover with character flaws to an ugly angel. This is an uncomfortable truth we do our best to ignore. But it's actually a good thing. It implies that you don't need to distort your personality or pretend to be someone else to find love. You're free to be yourself.

Women who bring up personality when the topic is beauty are often afraid they can't compete on appearance alone. Shifting the discussion to personality allows them to surreptitiously change the game to one they think they can win. Since the scorekeeping is nebulous, at least they know they can't lose. And as a bonus, they seem "nice" (the most common motive for dishonesty).

This clever trick is counterproductive here, because our goal is to improve your appearance, not measure your value as a human. When you're learning to swim you shouldn't excuse the flaws in your stroke by bragging about unrelated skills.

Nevertheless, even on a purely visual level, expressing your personality does help a little. More importantly, it makes it easier for the right mate to find you.

It's not necessary to develop an individual style, especially below the neck. And while the unique features of your face will often determine which men are interested and which aren't, they're largely out of your control. So get the basics right with the generic beauty techniques we've discussed above, then add some touches of character in the details. You can do this with clothing choices, accessories, or even makeup.

Personality and individuality may have limited relevance to beauty, but this doesn't imply that all women should conform to a single ideal. Appealing to a minority taste can work too. Remember, it doesn't matter if most men are indifferent to you as long as some of them value you highly.

At times the right strategy is simply to make the best of what you already have. But don’t use this as an excuse to neglect basics or maintain unhealthy habits.

8. Beauty and aging.

No one seriously doubts women are more beautiful when they’re younger. However, the claim that they hit a "wall" at thirty and suddenly turn ugly isn't true. It’s possible for older women to remain attractive, so you shouldn’t give up just because you reach a certain age.

The techniques I’ve mentioned in this article work for older women just as well as younger women, and may even offer older women greater benefits. Careful attention to diet and exercise is essential. Of course, makeup and surgery also help.

The most common beauty mistake among women over thirty is adopting a short hairstyle for a “fresh and youthful look.” This invariably has the opposite effect. Don't dabble in androgyny when your fertility is fading. Short hair makes middle-aged women look older.

Some claim curves don’t age well. This one of the biggest beauty myths, and only applies if you don't take care of yourself. In fact, youthful skin is the least durable element of attractiveness. Because your other assets diminish faster, your basic silhouette is responsible for an increasing fraction of your sex appeal over time.

And the older you are, the more curves men want. For instance, imaginary women who look older than thirty almost always have large or huge breasts.

We can demonstrate this relationship between curves, age, and attractiveness statistically. In the same database of erotic drawings analyzed earlier in the article, images tagged “mature woman” have significantly larger breasts than the broader collection. Huge breasts are six times more common, while small breasts are seven times less common. Images tagged “loli,” on the other hand, have significantly smaller breasts than the broader collection. The charts below show the change.

By comparing the three charts we can see that the shift toward curves sets in very early, and continues well past the end of puberty. Note that here “mature woman” doesn't refer to seniors, but to any woman over thirty. The next gallery will illustrate.

While breast size is the easiest to categorize, this shift is more about curves in general than breasts in particular. The women depicted in these images have wider hips, thicker thighs, larger butts, and a higher overall bodyfat level. Naturally they still retain the relatively small waist that characterizes an hourglass figure, without which the curves would be meaningless.

You might imagine men's preference for especially extravagant proportions in women over thirty is limited to anime, but that's not the case. When I examined AI girls posted on social media under the hashtag “#milf,” I found a similar pattern. The examples below are typical.

Sex dolls fit the pattern too. At a major retailer, most “milf” dolls are categorized as “curvy,” while most “teen” dolls are categorized as “petite.”

So not only are curves responsible for a larger fraction of your visual appeal as you age, but men who are still attracted to older women want more of them. If there's been a decline in your sex life over time, aging without enough curves might be a contributing factor.

Make sure you've optimized your weight according to the guidelines given earlier. Your ideal weight may be slightly higher than it was when you were younger. For those who aren't able to develop good natural curves, surgeries that create them artificially can recover some of your lost sex appeal. Breast implants are especially useful for older women, including those who never had curves when they were younger. Other surgeries that add curves should help too, though they usually have a lower impact.

Procedures to correct sagging skin are also worth considering. To determine if you'd benefit from a breast lift, see the earlier segment titled “How Much Sagging Is Too Much?” Unfortunately I don't have time to analyze all the cosmetic procedures intended to restore youthful features in detail here. Some of them work, and some of them don't.

While it's hard to prove numerically, older women seem to be presented as more sexually aggressive in erotic imagery. Seduction strategies relying on neotenous behaviors are less likely to work, and some movements may become less effective as you age. But excluding these, you should increase your use of the techniques described in the sections on motion and seduction, and initiate sex a larger fraction of the time than you did when you were younger.

There are limits to what medicine can achieve today, and it’s important to be realistic. Surgery can’t truly reverse aging, and trying too hard to erase the years will do more harm than good. Creams and lotions currently advertised as rejuvenating have little real effect. Acting young can't make you young. Only genuine rejuvenation technology will get that job done.

Rejuvenation medicine is more plausible than it might sound. Because aging is simply an accumulation of damage, reversing it is no different in principle to repairing an old car. Of course, the cellular machinery in our skin is far more sophisticated than an engine, so the task is quite difficult. But we'll accomplish it one day. And if demand is vocal enough, that day may even come soon enough for you to benefit. Public advocacy for rejuvenation research is a great way to help. I explain further here.

For now, however, no woman looks better at forty than at twenty-five. And while you age, the most eligible males are snatched away by other women. If you want the best long-term partner you can get, you shouldn’t waste time. Those who tell you otherwise don’t have your interests at heart. Find him sooner rather than later, then use modern technology and good health practices to retain your beauty longer.

9. The top seven ways to look more attractive.

Here's a simplified checklist of the seven most effective ways to look more attractive. These may seem obvious, but hardly any women today cover them all.

Start at the top and work down. 1, 4, 5, and 6 will help develop or enhance an hourglass shape. 2, 3, and 7 will take care of the rest.

Since seven is a more auspicious number than eight, I've listed motion as a bonus point. It actually has a multiplicative effect on all the others. Fear of seeming ridiculous during the learning curve prevents most women from taking what's actually an easy win. If you persist a short while and get it right, men won't be able to look away.

Some women may feel uncomfortable to see surgery on the list. If you're morally opposed or have a low tolerance for risk, feel free to ignore it. Nevertheless, breast augmentation is one of the most effective beauty interventions. The recommended size can add a full point on the ten-point beauty scale. Omitting it from the list to make readers feel more comfortable would go against the high-minded principles that motivate this article.

There's no point in getting an augmentation before you've optimized your weight, because men evaluate breast size in relation to waist size. The same holds for motions and gait. These only increase attractiveness for women who already have a good baseline. Otherwise they will fall flat. So it's best to go through the list in order.

Take a moment to consider just how little time and money is necessary to look more attractive. Only points six and seven on the list above require a significant commitment of resources. Most women aren't failing because they're not trying hard enough. They're failing because they're trying too hard to do the wrong things. Before you try harder, aim better.

This top-seven list isn't exhaustive. However, as you go beyond it your returns will diminish. One of the most common beauty mistakes is to obsess over irrelevancies. Conventional beauty advice reinforces this mistake by encouraging you to worry about details that don't matter so you buy stuff that doesn't help.

I've kept it simple for good reason. Prioritize the basics and don't stress about the rest.

A closing note. No matter how well you apply the beauty techniques described in this article, you'll eventually run into limits. If you want to outperform your appearance, pay special attention to the section on seduction. There I've explained why men consider sexual enthusiasm in general, and oral skill and frequency in particular, the best way to compensate for other limitations. What to do with that information is up to you.

XIII. Answering objections.

Here I'll directly answer the most common objections to this article. If you're already in agreement, you may want to skip to the next section.

1. “This article objectifies women.”

“The objectification of women” is a harmful meme we should all reject. Why? Because it uses the word “objectify” to conflate two distinct concepts.

1. Being treated like an inanimate thing (dehumanization)
2. Being perceived and acted on by a subject

1 is bad, but 2 can be good. The meme's payload is to denigrate 2 by association with 1.

Because many women enjoy being perceived and acted on, conflating this with dehumanization sets a psychological trap for them. It persuades them that they ought to have moral objections to their own enjoyment, and that conventional relations of male and female are inherently bad.

There's nothing morally wrong with appealing to the male gaze. And you're not psychologically defective if you enjoy it. In fact, you're completely normal. So when you want to criticize dehumanization, do it explicitly instead of spreading the "objectification" meme. This meme actually hurts women.

Finally, the purpose of this article is to empower women by offering them the truth. Not to dehumanize them. Any reader smarter than a sex doll should be able to understand that I've presented dolls and anime girls as useful examples of men's visual preferences, not as a recommendation to be vapid. Beautiful, intelligent, wholesome, human, and an object of desire: yes, it's really possible to be all these things at once.

2. “Your conclusions are obvious.” And, “Your conclusions are wrong.”

I agree that some of the conclusions are obvious. Indeed, the first words of this article are, “The facts about feminine beauty are simple and intuitive, even obvious.” However, things that are obvious to some aren't obvious to others. I receive a large volume of negative and even hateful comments denying any of it is true. Most of it includes slander directed at me personally. I'll tell this story in detail so you can understand just why beauty lies are so persistent.

Naive readers might find it hard to believe that a single free article, purportedly written in this highly aesthetic font by an Oriental sex slaver, could really provide more accurate and useful information about feminine beauty than the totality of previously published academic research (generated at a cost to the public of eight figures in professorial salaries). Not to mention the many misleading periodicals on fashion and beauty that consume even more money. Yet in an age dominated by liars, incompetents, and frauds, could it really be otherwise?

If you haven't experienced it firsthand, you can't imagine the amount of hate I've been subjected to for sharing the information you've just read. People object to my obvious conclusions vociferously. They can get nasty!

Many girls seem to think that denigrating me, willfully misrepresenting my writing, or suppressing my data will make them more beautiful. (It won't.) The strength of public opposition has been such that I regret having wasted my time on a subject that's brought me so much trouble and so little personal benefit instead of pursuing my many other interests. If you've read this far, I sincerely hope you've gotten more from Dispelling Beauty Lies than I have.

Journalists can be worse still, as the example below makes clear. This offended journalist jumped straight into ad hominems without bothering to read more than a few lines of my writing. She dug up a months-old joke and used it to misrepresent my work to over 600,000 people, and ignored many requests to correct the record. She went on to attack my novels despite reading no further than the chapter titles, telling the public they're erotica when they're actually comedy, as any intelligent reader can verify in a few minutes. All because I provide evidence men like more curves than she has. Pretty lies might not make you pretty, but that doesn't mean ugly lies work any better.

Censors, however, are not to be outdone. After a set of social media posts summarizing my "obvious" conclusions began to go viral, content moderators shadowbanned them to prevent their spread. Even links to this article have been removed repeatedly. New accounts under new names did nothing to escape the pattern. Explicit pornography and extreme politics are demonstrably less suppressed than my writing on beauty.

As I write these words, three of the top five search engines have banned direct links to Dispelling Beauty Lies. No, this is not about “safe search.” They're quite happy to provide links to pornographic sites.

Today's professional censors leave unpopular dissent alone to create the illusion of free speech. But when ideas they dislike begin to catch on, they manipulate procedural outcomes to tip the scales against their dissemination and favor their own cherished causes instead. For instance, through the inconsistent application of vague rules. By maintaining plausible deniability in this fashion they can shape society invisibly and pass off the result as the will of the public.

Corporate employees aren't the only important censors. Social media algorithms are set up in a way that allows a collective to silence ideas they don't like by downvoting, blocking, and reporting them. This can be exploited by a formal organization using a network of bots, or by randoms acting in aggregate. Are there really women out there so petty that they'd downvote, block, and report accurate information just for making them feel less attractive? To ask the question is to answer it.

That said, all of the forces who've worked to suppress this article have done a favor to the individual woman who's stumbled here by accident and is now reading these words. What you've found here is a secret guidebook. This guidebook is the best of its kind, and yet still unknown to the general public. And it's potent enough to give you a real advantage over your friends and enemies alike. I'd advise you to share it with them for the common good, but we both know you won't. Besides, even if you did, they wouldn't listen. So now it's your secret guidebook. Please use it wisely!

To irrefutably debunk the claim that my conclusions are obvious and everyone already agrees with them, the gallery below comprises the complete and unedited reaction to this article on a popular beauty forum. No, I don't expect you to read it all. I'm posting it here as a matter of public record. The chart shows the fraction of upvotes for positive, neutral, and negative comments. The woman who originally shared the link was shamed into deleting it, and later reposts were removed by moderators.

Fallacious reasoning, misplaced vanity, dishonesty, deception, defamation, and an overpowering urge to torture and execute the messenger are all on vivid display among my critics. And with tactics like those, who could lose?

Because we don't compare notes on taboo topics, there can be huge gaps in knowledge that we aren't aware of. These gaps reduce our collective quality of life. So even the obvious needs to be stated.

And in fact, much of the analysis I've presented is entirely novel. My recommendations differ markedly from both academic and public opinion at the time of writing. Few women today understand seduction or use attractive motions, while nearly all men like them. Although men assume otherwise, most women really don't know some of the key facts explained above. If they did, there'd be no reason to resort to censorship, manipulation, and deceit to conceal them.

Finally, when an attractive gait can be learned within a day but is hardly ever seen, it's clear that only a tiny minority of women have fully assimilated the truth about feminine beauty.

3. “Normal men don't buy sex dolls or look at anime girls. So, your conclusions are invalid.” And, “Normal women don't buy dildos. So, they prove nothing about the size women really prefer.” And, “This article is just about the tastes of porn-sick men. Not real, healthy tastes.”

It's true that most men don't buy sex dolls. But it's not true that the men who do buy them have aesthetic tastes that differ dramatically from the rest. Read carefully. The data from many sources confirms the same basic conclusions. These sources include not only sex dolls, cartoons, and AI girls, but also statues, paintings, search results, centerfolds, stereotypes, and common sense.

If you're grasping for excuses to dismiss all of it, you're rationalizing because you don't like the answer. And if the median sex doll seems like an abnormal representation of feminine beauty to you, you ought to take a step back and think harder. While some critics try to denounce it as bizarre, fetishistic, and extreme, it's really just a conventional “bombshell” figure.

4. “The love goddess examples in this article are cherry-picked, and they don't prove anything about today.”

Historical representations of feminine beauty aren't random. In fact, they show a definite pattern. As we've discussed, it's not hard to find variations and exceptions. But if you latch on to exceptions and pretend they're the rule, you're making a mistake.

Nevertheless, we live in the present, not the past. There's no reason to rely on the assumption that beauty standards never vary. Although historical archetypes of beauty can occident us in the right general direction, the contemporary data is more relevant and more reliable. And this contemporary data supports our conclusions.

5. “This entire article is about how men like big boobs, but I don't have/want/like them, therefore you're totally wrong, and also evil. They don't matter at all. Delete your website right now.”

Would you be this angry if I said men like girls with large ears?

No. You wouldn't.

But why not?

6. “You write too positively about makeup, implants, and other cosmetic surgery.”

Beauty isn't a game with rules. But if it were, "cheat to win" would be good advice. Anything less is an unforced surrender to genetic luck.

Breast augmentation is extremely common in glamour models, and more common in the general population than most people suspect. The large majority of women with implants are glad they have them, but keep quiet because of the social stigma. In an article that aims at the truth, it's entirely correct to write positively.

A good set of large implants can give you a substantial advantage, because a significant fraction of men are obsessed with big breasts.

The primary material reason not to go under the knife is the risk of complications or a botched surgery. The guidelines provided in this article are reasonable and measured, but it's impossible to eliminate risk entirely. That's why I highlight successful cosmetic surgery, but stop short of advising it for all women.

7. “The beauty standard described in this article is heteronormative.”

I'm concerned with determining the facts about straight men's tastes and the most effective techniques to satisfy them. Not with enforcing or subverting norms. How you use this information is up to you. You might be surprised to learn that transsexuals intent on duplicating men's ideal female body have been more receptive than the average woman to whom this article was originally addressed.

Most heterosexual women today would be unwilling to accept and profit from the strongest conceivable evidence that straight men consider the figure above ideal. Their indifference to heterosexual tastes seems inexplicably absolute. Instead they chase fashionable beauty standards shaped by gay men. Perhaps they too secretly wish to be trans?

8. “You claim all men like the same thing, but I don't like that thing, your article is wrong, you are dumb.”

No, I explicitly and repeatedly state otherwise. This is what it looks like when all men like the same thing:

And this is what it looks like when men like different things:

This article is intended for intelligent people with good reading comprehension and the ability to understand bar charts, as well as the logic of supply and demand. If you do not meet these criteria, please find a simpler beauty article to read instead of criticizing one you can't follow.

9. “This article is just an elaborate justification of your personal tastes.”

While some of the illustrations have been arbitrarily chosen by the author, the data has not. The reasoning is objective and honest, and applies generally. If you dislike the models below, you can indulge in an ad hominem. But it's not that easy to dismiss the conclusions.

In point of fact, many of the photos were submitted by readers. They don't necessarily represent the author's tastes.

10. “No one believes you and this article isn't helping anyone. Are you just trying to be mean?”

There are two groups who readily accept the truth. The first is men. The second is women who are already very attractive. Both of these groups have firsthand knowledge that what people publicly claim is beautiful isn't what men actually respond to. They're happy to read a coherent explanation of the reality they already see.

However, this article aims to help smart and open-minded women of average attractiveness, as well as women who are victims of an eating disorder. If you're one of these women you may have trouble accepting the truth, even if you recognize it subconsciously.

It actually doesn't matter if you accept the data I've presented. Besides, we all know long arguments can obscure the truth as easily as they can reveal it. What does matter is whether acting on the claims increases your success with men and your quality of life.

So keep an open mind and a pragmatic attitude, and try the beauty tips above, starting with those that require the smallest investment and the minimum risk. They will help, and that's the important thing.

11. What is the “monarchiste” body type?

The monarchiste body type is a voluptuous and pronounced hourglass. The term was inspired by a real woman who resembled the model below, and described herself as a monarchiste awaiting the restoration.

This body type is still very popular with men. It was once common in paintings and considered the pinnacle of feminine beauty. But it's particularly ill-served by current fashions. Monarchistes today often dress badly and underestimate their own attractiveness. To rectify this situation, it's worth singling them out for praise with an amusing and historically resonant term.

12. “I want to be a trophy wife in a social circle of wealthy status-seekers. Shouldn't I copy the high-status look promoted by today's media and fashion world instead of the 'truth' you write about?”

Probably. But look out for your husband's secretary. You should also ask yourself if a man who'd marry a status symbol instead of a woman he's actually attracted to is really the kind of man you want. As time wears on, your desire for him may not survive the nagging thought that he's emasculated himself just to impress others of his social class.

Some of today's elites are trapped in a negative-sum game where they sacrifice beauty to win status points. This game is refereed by fashion and art critics in places like New York and Milan. I explain how the process works in my companion article "Against Good Taste." Whether you should participate in this negative-sum game is ultimately a question for you to decide. This article is titled "The Truth About Feminine Beauty," not "How To Dig For Gold."

13. “Dispelling Beauty Lies is too long.”

Even people who claim to hate this article end up reading it to the end, which says a lot about the validity of the complaint.

14. “Will you write an article on the truth about masculine beauty?”

No. Stupidity is making the same mistake twice.

15. How can I follow your work or learn more about you?

My bio is available here. Explore the rest of this website to discover my fiction, music, and essays, and subscribe if you find them interesting. You can also contact me or follow me on social media using the addresses listed here. For the reasons explained earlier in this section, I've closed the account that was dedicated to promoting this article.

Appendix: survey results.

As I explained in the very first section, beauty surveys are unreliable. I've cited them above in rare cases where I could find no other source of information to answer an interesting question. You shouldn't interpret this inclusion as a confident endorsement.

Logic and solid evidence flow unnoticed through a sewer. Because they're more popular on social media than better sources, it was necessary to use polls for promotion, along with a vivid presentation style that increased visibility. These promotional polls may support my conclusions, but they by no means serve as their basis. For your entertainment, I provide a selection below. Most reached an audience that greatly exceeded my own following.

The trio of polls below show that runway models are barely more attractive to men than impossibly extreme physiques. Men may date them as status symbols, but few actually like them.

I asked men to rate reader-submitted photos of the most attractive large breasts for shape, ignoring size. Several days later I asked which they believed were fake. I'll share the result to satisfy your curiosity, with no guarantee of accuracy.

Respondents judged about half of the best-shaped breasts in the world to be fake, and assigned no quality premium to natural breasts. What's the correct number? You're welcome to make your own guess. Men's top choice in my best butt shape survey (at center) was actually photoshopped, which says a lot about the true value of naturalness.

I also asked men what traits they consider dealbreakers. In other words, single traits that are disqualifying even in an otherwise attractive woman. This is valuable information, though of course we can't be confident that men are reporting the truth in polls.

What I found was that men rarely consider physical flaws dealbreakers in isolation. For instance, only around a quarter of men consider a flat chest or a flat butt a dealbreaker in a woman who's otherwise attractive, even though these traits have a large influence on attractiveness. This suggests men perceive beauty holistically. So if there's one particular flaw that's bothering you, you probably shouldn't obsess about it. Being meaningfully overweight, on the other hand, is a real dealbreaker, because it distorts your entire figure.

So, what dealbreakers do men claim are more important than physical flaws? A variety of negative character traits: uses hard drugs, only cares about money, bitchy, former sex worker, high body count, etc. Men also look poorly on women who are bad lovers, with most agreeing that being stiff in bed and never giving fellatio are dealbreakers. I don't believe they really consider these dealbreakers, but I also don't doubt that they consider them very significant negatives.

You might suspect my poll results only reflect the opinions of my following, not the general public. That's a reasonable fear. But by comparing early and late responses to polls that reached a large audience, I've been able to establish that differences between the opinions of my most devoted followers and broader opinion on social media are minor.

Some skeptics still insist that my followers are unusually obsessed with large breasts. But the early and late results to my widely viewed poll on an exceptionally buxom woman's reduction reveal that the general public is actually more keen. The evidence is below.

I still maintain that polls are unreliable data. But my readers aren't to blame. They're actually pretty normal.

I'll conclude with one of my most memorable poll results. I wanted to know whether men’s taste in feminine beauty was related to their taste in other realms of aesthetics. So I asked them to indicate both their preferred body type and their preferred interior design style. The results showed a striking correlation.

Afterword

Perverse social dynamics mean that beauty lies will always persist to some degree. But by sharing this article you can help to spread the truth, and help more women to look their best. That’s good for men and women alike. So if you know someone who might benefit from learning the truth about feminine beauty, please send them a link, or better yet, be brave and post one on your social media account. Feel free to include the eye-catching infographics below, or the even more eye-catching "perfect shape" infographic here.

If you're a male and don't feel comfortable explaining to women what you find attractive, just show them this article instead. And if you need to maintain an air of respectability, share it with a critical comment like, “This piece gets all the facts about feminine beauty right but still somehow totally misses the big picture,” and then go on to explain how you actually prefer average-looking girls. Or, denigrate the article's author as an untrustworthy character while admitting with feigned reluctance that the claims are accurate.

The feminine desire to be beautiful and the masculine desire to possess that beauty are basic human drives that should draw men and women together. Yet today liars and profiteers are manipulating them to drive the sexes apart. While the beauty industry and the media lure women toward a false representation of beauty cleverly designed to play on their vanity and ambitions, the sex industry is filling the resulting gap by selling men an empty simulacrum of possession. The foundations of love are being crowded out on both sides.

Unfortunately, the reasoned examination you've read here isn't enough to correct beauty lies on a larger scale. Women's intuitions about feminine beauty are based on the gradual, unconscious assimilation of social cues. By showing young women a vast quantity of fake social cues that are designed to be psychologically potent, modern media has broken their intuitions. It's similar to holding a magnet near a compass.

Only a small minority of women are capable of setting aside these broken intuitions, and their pride, to arrive at the truth. To help the deluded majority a massive social movement would be necessary, strong enough to outweigh both the persuasive power of modern media and the everyday lies men tell for convenience. It would have to rely on propagandistic methods like repetition and signaling, not reason. Such a movement is unlikely to arise any time soon.

And perhaps it's for the best if it never does. The love and lust that surge up from deep within us are the most audible cries of truth in a society dominated by respectable liars. The truth, you see, hasn't agreed to be respectable in all cases; but the respectable have. So it's fitting that they go through life miming a simulacrum of eros, while beauty remains to the rest of us an open secret, whose querulous call awakens us too to other, quieter truths.

It may be irritating to watch people stubbornly clinging to beauty lies, but keep in mind that you can turn their errors to your advantage. You might even consider this, dear female readers, your induction to a secret society.

Today women are taught that it's wrong to make any effort to please the "male gaze." But the male gaze is the most practically important yardstick for feminine beauty. Women who recognize this and learn what men find attractive have an opportunity to snatch the best mates away from their competitors and build stronger, happier, more lasting relationships.

The first and most difficult step is to accept and acknowledge your own faults with good grace. Very few can do this! Then, while other women succumb to illusions and narcissistic delusions, you can get ahead by making use of the information I've presented here. You don't need to convince anyone with words. Men will react to true beauty instinctively—and you'll win the game that really matters.

Good luck, dear female readers. And now that you’re prepared for your new life as an odalisque, it’s time to travel to the Orient!

For the remarkable tale of my wicked rise to almost absolute power, including bonus tips for the plundering and profitable resale of Occidental virgins, read my comic novel Memoirs of an Evil Vizier. You may also enjoy my article on beauty lies in the art world: Against Good Taste.

Dispelling Beauty Lies was written in 2020 and revised and expanded from 2021-2024.

Also by J. Sanilac

An Introduction to My Music

Memoirs of an Evil Vizier

Trust Networks: How We Actually Know Things

Ultrahumanism: How We Can All Win

GIMBY: A Movement For Low-Density Housing

Critique of the Mind-Body Problem

End Attached Garages Now

A Pragmatical Analysis of Religious Beliefs

Against Good Taste

Amor Fatty

Milgram Questions

The Computer-Simulation Theory Is Silly